Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Arc A750, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 650 Ti Boost
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 134 Watt
8.75

Arc A750 outperforms GTX 650 Ti Boost by a whopping 262% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking493178
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.2857.09
Power efficiency4.519.72
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGK106DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date26 March 2013 (11 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 $289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A750 has 1641% better value for money than GTX 650 Ti Boost.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683584
Core clock speed980 MHz2050 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)134 Watt225 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.05537.6
Floating-point processing power1.585 TFLOPS17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs24112
TMUs64224
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Multi monitor support4 Displaysno data
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 650 Ti Boost 8.75
Arc A750 31.71
+262%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 650 Ti Boost 3364
Arc A750 12193
+262%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 650 Ti Boost 4390
Arc A750 29667
+576%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−263%
109
+263%
1440p16−18
−269%
59
+269%
4K9−10
−300%
36
+300%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.63
−112%
2.65
+112%
1440p10.56
−116%
4.90
+116%
4K18.78
−134%
8.03
+134%
  • Arc A750 has 112% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Arc A750 has 116% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Arc A750 has 134% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 91
+0%
91
+0%
Elden Ring 84
+0%
84
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 88
+0%
88
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 285
+0%
285
+0%
Metro Exodus 116
+0%
116
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 76
+0%
76
+0%
Dota 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Elden Ring 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 239
+0%
239
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 99
+0%
99
+0%
Metro Exodus 94
+0%
94
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 199
+0%
199
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 41
+0%
41
+0%
Elden Ring 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+0%
41
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
World of Tanks 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 54
+0%
54
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 145
+0%
145
+0%
Metro Exodus 86
+0%
86
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+0%
57
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
Dota 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Elden Ring 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 43
+0%
43
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 84
+0%
84
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how GTX 650 Ti Boost and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A750 is 263% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A750 is 269% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A750 is 300% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.75 31.71
Recency 26 March 2013 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 134 Watt 225 Watt

GTX 650 Ti Boost has 67.9% lower power consumption.

Arc A750, on the other hand, has a 262.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A750 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Intel Arc A750
Arc A750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 377 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 868 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.