GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs 590

Aggregate performance score

GTX 590
2011
3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) GDDR5, 365 Watt
8.64

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 590 by a whopping 133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking464257
Place by popularitynot in top-10080
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.4718.31
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGF110N18P-G62
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 March 2011 (13 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data
Current price$600 (0.9x MSRP)$892

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has 3796% better value for money than GTX 590.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241024
CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed607 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)365 Watt50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate77.7 billion/sec95.04
Floating-point performance2x 1,244.2 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 590 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm)no data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsTwo 8-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)4 GB
Memory bus width768-bit (384-bit per GPU)128 Bit
Memory clock speed1707 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth327.7 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsThree Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 590 8.64
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.17
+133%

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 590 by 133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 590 3341
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+133%

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 590 by 133% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 590 9167
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266
+44.7%

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 590 by 45% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 590 25720
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517
+69.2%

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 590 by 69% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 590 6680
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930
+48.7%

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 590 by 49% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p47
−113%
100−110
+113%
Full HD106
+82.8%
58
−82.8%
1200p112
−132%
260−270
+132%
1440p18−20
−144%
44
+144%
4K10−12
−170%
27
+170%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−321%
59
+321%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−239%
61
+239%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−308%
49
+308%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−154%
65−70
+154%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−179%
53
+179%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−229%
46
+229%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−165%
69
+165%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−265%
84
+265%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−120%
65−70
+120%
Hitman 3 20−22
−315%
83
+315%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−283%
115
+283%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−279%
91
+279%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−83.3%
44
+83.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−280%
95
+280%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−300%
60
+300%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−156%
46
+156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−167%
32
+167%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−154%
65−70
+154%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−237%
64
+237%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−157%
36
+157%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−169%
70
+169%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−157%
59
+157%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−120%
65−70
+120%
Hitman 3 20−22
−125%
45
+125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−203%
91
+203%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−158%
62
+158%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−75%
42
+75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−148%
62
+148%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−300%
72
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−247%
52
+247%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−50%
27
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−25%
15
+25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−63.2%
31
+63.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−143%
34
+143%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−50%
39
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−120%
65−70
+120%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−113%
64
+113%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−138%
57
+138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−117%
39
+117%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−46.7%
22
+46.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−70.8%
41
+70.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−129%
35−40
+129%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Hitman 3 10−12
−145%
27
+145%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−183%
17
+183%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−136%
24−27
+136%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−300%
16
+300%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−143%
30−35
+143%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−144%
35−40
+144%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−128%
40−45
+128%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−245%
35−40
+245%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−356%
40−45
+356%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−188%
21−24
+188%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 21−24
−119%
46
+119%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−214%
21−24
+214%
Hitman 3 5−6
−220%
16
+220%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−350%
18
+350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−317%
25
+317%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−367%
28
+367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−200%
14−16
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−180%
27−30
+180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%

This is how GTX 590 and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 113% faster in 900p
  • GTX 590 is 83% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 132% faster in 1200p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 144% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 170% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1650 Ti Mobile surpassed GTX 590 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.64 20.17
Recency 24 March 2011 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 365 Watt 50 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 590 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 590 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
GeForce GTX 590
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 47 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1450 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.