FirePro S10000 Passive vs GeForce GTX 590
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 496 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.78 | no data |
Power efficiency | 1.65 | no data |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) |
GPU code name | GF110 | Tahiti |
Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 24 March 2011 (13 years ago) | 12 November 2012 (12 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $3,599 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 3584 |
Core clock speed | 607 MHz | 825 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 950 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 4,313 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 365 Watt | 750 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | no data |
Texture fill rate | 38.91 | 106.4 |
Floating-point processing power | 1.244 TFLOPS | 3.405 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 48 | 32 |
TMUs | 64 | 112 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 279 mm | 305 mm |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | no data |
Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
Form factor | no data | full height / full length |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) | 6 GB |
Memory bus width | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1707 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 327.7 GB/s | 480 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort |
Multi monitor support | + | no data |
HDMI | + | - |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Dual-link DVI support | - | + |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 24 March 2011 | 12 November 2012 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) | 6 GB |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 365 Watt | 750 Watt |
GTX 590 has 105.5% lower power consumption.
S10000 Passive, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 590 and FirePro S10000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 590 is a desktop card while FirePro S10000 Passive is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.