Arc A770 vs GeForce GTX 590

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 590 and Arc A770, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 590
2011
3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) GDDR5, 365 Watt
8.49

Arc A770 outperforms GTX 590 by a whopping 294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking504155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.7755.61
Power efficiency1.6310.45
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGF110DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date24 March 2011 (13 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Arc A770 has 7122% better value for money than GTX 590.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024 ×24096
Core clock speed607 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)365 Watt225 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate38.91 ×2614.4
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPS ×219.66 TFLOPS
ROPs48 ×2128
TMUs64 ×2256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length279 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) ×216 GB
Memory bus width768-bit (384-bit per GPU) ×2256 Bit
Memory clock speed1707 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth327.7 GB/s ×2512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsThree Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 590 8.49
Arc A770 33.47
+294%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 590 3341
Arc A770 13172
+294%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 590 9167
Arc A770 41303
+351%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 590 25720
Arc A770 103295
+302%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 590 6680
Arc A770 32666
+389%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p47
−283%
180−190
+283%
Full HD111
+0%
111
+0%
1200p112
−257%
400−450
+257%
1440p14−16
−343%
62
+343%
4K10−12
−300%
40
+300%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.30
−112%
2.96
+112%
1440p49.93
−841%
5.31
+841%
4K69.90
−750%
8.23
+750%
  • Arc A770 has 112% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Arc A770 has 841% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Arc A770 has 750% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
−795%
179
+795%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−625%
116
+625%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−359%
78
+359%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
−560%
132
+560%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−225%
110−120
+225%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−519%
99
+519%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−312%
70
+312%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−350%
117
+350%
Fortnite 45−50
−194%
140−150
+194%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+9.1%
33
−9.1%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
−595%
139
+595%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−338%
120−130
+338%
Valorant 80−85
−139%
190−200
+139%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
−395%
99
+395%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−225%
110−120
+225%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−450%
88
+450%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−116%
270−280
+116%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−259%
61
+259%
Dota 2 60−65
−293%
240−250
+293%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−319%
109
+319%
Fortnite 45−50
−194%
140−150
+194%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+16.1%
31
−16.1%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
−535%
127
+535%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
−250%
105
+250%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−606%
113
+606%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−338%
120−130
+338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−833%
196
+833%
Valorant 80−85
−139%
190−200
+139%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−225%
110−120
+225%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−419%
83
+419%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−241%
58
+241%
Dota 2 60−65
−293%
240−250
+293%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−300%
104
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+56.5%
23
−56.5%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−338%
120−130
+338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−243%
72
+243%
Valorant 80−85
−139%
190−200
+139%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−194%
140−150
+194%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
−249%
220−230
+249%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
−309%
45
+309%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−788%
71
+788%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−317%
170−180
+317%
Valorant 90−95
−154%
230−240
+154%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−372%
85−90
+372%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−543%
45
+543%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−382%
82
+382%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+26.7%
15
−26.7%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−362%
60
+362%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−376%
80−85
+376%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−257%
24−27
+257%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−400%
10
+400%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−153%
48
+153%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1467%
47
+1467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−813%
73
+813%
Valorant 40−45
−357%
190−200
+357%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−650%
15
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−767%
26
+767%
Dota 2 30−33
−267%
110−120
+267%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−513%
49
+513%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+62.5%
8
−62.5%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−375%
35−40
+375%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−375%
35−40
+375%

This is how GTX 590 and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is 283% faster in 900p
  • A tie in 1080p
  • Arc A770 is 257% faster in 1200p
  • Arc A770 is 343% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770 is 300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 590 is 63% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A770 is 1467% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 590 is ahead in 5 tests (8%)
  • Arc A770 is ahead in 56 tests (92%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.49 33.47
Recency 24 March 2011 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 365 Watt 225 Watt

Arc A770 has a 294.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 566.7% more advanced lithography process, and 62.2% lower power consumption.

The Arc A770 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 590 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
GeForce GTX 590
Intel Arc A770
Arc A770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 50 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 5380 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 590 or Arc A770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.