Quadro P2200 vs GeForce GTX 580M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 580M SLI with Quadro P2200, including specs and performance data.

GTX 580M SLI
2011
100 Watt
9.29

P2200 outperforms 580M SLI by a whopping 142% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking505281
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.1423.00
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameN12E-GTX2GP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2011 (14 years ago)10 June 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681280
Core clock speed620 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1493 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data119.4
Floating-point processing powerno data3.822 TFLOPS
ROPsno data40
TMUsno data80
L1 Cacheno data480 KB
L2 Cacheno data1280 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data201 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amountno data5 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1251 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data200.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p68
−135%
160−170
+135%
Full HD93
−137%
220−230
+137%
1200p81
−135%
190−200
+135%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−140%
120−130
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
−138%
100−105
+138%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−140%
120−130
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%
Fortnite 55−60
−128%
130−140
+128%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−132%
95−100
+132%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−141%
70−75
+141%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−135%
80−85
+135%
Valorant 90−95
−142%
220−230
+142%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
−138%
100−105
+138%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−140%
120−130
+140%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−110%
300−310
+110%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Dota 2 65−70
−135%
160−170
+135%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%
Fortnite 55−60
−128%
130−140
+128%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−132%
95−100
+132%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−141%
70−75
+141%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−129%
80−85
+129%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−135%
80−85
+135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
Valorant 90−95
−142%
220−230
+142%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
−138%
100−105
+138%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Dota 2 65−70
−135%
160−170
+135%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−133%
70−75
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−132%
95−100
+132%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−135%
80−85
+135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
Valorant 90−95
−142%
220−230
+142%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−128%
130−140
+128%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−122%
40−45
+122%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−136%
170−180
+136%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−124%
110−120
+124%
Valorant 100−110
−140%
250−260
+140%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−127%
50−55
+127%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Valorant 45−50
−124%
110−120
+124%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Dota 2 35−40
−129%
80−85
+129%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%

This is how GTX 580M SLI and Quadro P2200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P2200 is 135% faster in 900p
  • Quadro P2200 is 137% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P2200 is 135% faster in 1200p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.29 22.46
Recency 6 January 2011 10 June 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro P2200 has a 141.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 580M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 580M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P2200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M SLI
GeForce GTX 580M SLI
NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 580M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 441 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 580M SLI or Quadro P2200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.