Tesla M2090 vs GeForce GTX 580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 580
2010
1536 MB GDDR5, 244 Watt
11.81
+24.4%

GeForce GTX 580 outperforms Tesla M2090 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking378433
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.170.54
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF110GF110
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date9 November 2010 (13 years ago)25 July 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data
Current price$14.89 (0x MSRP)$1844

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 580 has 1413% better value for money than Tesla M2090.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512512
CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed772 MHz651 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)244 Watt250 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate49.4 billion/sec41.66
Floating-point performance1,581.1 gflops1,331.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)248 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsOne 6-pin and One 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2004 MHz (4008 data rate)3696 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.4 GB/s177.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMini HDMITwo Dual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.11.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 580 11.81
+24.4%
Tesla M2090 9.49

GeForce GTX 580 outperforms Tesla M2090 by 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 580 67
+36.7%
Tesla M2090 49

GeForce GTX 580 outperforms Tesla M2090 by 37% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p53
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%
Full HD96
+28%
75−80
−28%
1200p78
+30%
60−65
−30%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Hitman 3 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Hitman 3 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Hitman 3 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Hitman 3 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Battlefield 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%

This is how GTX 580 and Tesla M2090 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 580 is 33% faster in 900p
  • GTX 580 is 28% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 580 is 30% faster in 1200p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.81 9.49
Recency 9 November 2010 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 244 Watt 250 Watt

The GeForce GTX 580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M2090 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 580 is a desktop card while Tesla M2090 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
GeForce GTX 580
NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Tesla M2090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 436 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 29 votes

Rate Tesla M2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.