GeForce GT 220 vs GTX 580
Aggregated performance score
GTX 580 outperforms GT 220 by a whopping 2007% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 377 | 1173 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 8.17 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | GT2xx (2009−2012) |
| GPU code name | GF110 | GT216 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 9 November 2010 (13 years ago) | 12 October 2009 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $79.99 |
| Current price | $14.89 (0x MSRP) | $121 (1.5x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
GTX 580 and GT 220 have a nearly equal value for money.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 48 |
| CUDA cores | 512 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 772 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 486 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 244 Watt | 58 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | 105 °C |
| Texture fill rate | 49.4 billion/sec | 9.840 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,581.1 gflops | 144 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | 6.6" (16.8 cm) |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin and One 8-pin | no data |
| SLI options | + | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) | 790 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.4 GB/s | 25.3 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI | VGADVIHDMI |
| Multi monitor support | + | + |
| HDMI | + | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | S/PDIF + HDA |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | + | N/A |
| CUDA | + | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GTX 580 outperforms GT 220 by 2007% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
GTX 580 outperforms GT 220 by 2024% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 53
+2550%
| 2−3
−2550%
|
| Full HD | 98
+367%
| 21
−367%
|
| 1200p | 78
+2500%
| 3−4
−2500%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+500%
|
3−4
−500%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 24−27
+2400%
|
1−2
−2400%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+3900%
|
1−2
−3900%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 30−35
+288%
|
8−9
−288%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+500%
|
3−4
−500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
+2900%
|
1−2
−2900%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 30−35
+3100%
|
1−2
−3100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+4100%
|
1−2
−4100%
|
| Hitman 3 | 30−35
+3000%
|
1−2
−3000%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 24−27
+2300%
|
1−2
−2300%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 24−27
+317%
|
6−7
−317%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 21−24 | 0−1 |
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 24−27
+2400%
|
1−2
−2400%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+3900%
|
1−2
−3900%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 30−35
+288%
|
8−9
−288%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+500%
|
3−4
−500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
+2900%
|
1−2
−2900%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 30−35
+3100%
|
1−2
−3100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+4100%
|
1−2
−4100%
|
| Hitman 3 | 30−35
+3000%
|
1−2
−3000%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 24−27
+2300%
|
1−2
−2300%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+1700%
|
1−2
−1700%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 24−27
+317%
|
6−7
−317%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+700%
|
3−4
−700%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 21−24 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 24−27
+2400%
|
1−2
−2400%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+3900%
|
1−2
−3900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+500%
|
3−4
−500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
+2900%
|
1−2
−2900%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 30−35
+3100%
|
1−2
−3100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+4100%
|
1−2
−4100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+700%
|
3−4
−700%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 21−24 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 16−18
+750%
|
2−3
−750%
|
| Hitman 3 | 18−20
+500%
|
3−4
−500%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 16−18
+113%
|
8−9
−113%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 14−16
+275%
|
4−5
−275%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+2100%
|
1−2
−2100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+2100%
|
1−2
−2100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
+1000%
|
1−2
−1000%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
| Hitman 3 | 10−12
+1000%
|
1−2
−1000%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
+28.6%
|
7−8
−28.6%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 12−14
+140%
|
5−6
−140%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 4−5 | 0−1 |
This is how GTX 580 and GT 220 compete in popular games:
- GTX 580 is 2550% faster in 900p
- GTX 580 is 367% faster in 1080p
- GTX 580 is 2500% faster in 1200p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 580 is 1800% faster than the GT 220.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, GTX 580 surpassed GT 220 in all 25 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.80 | 0.56 |
| Recency | 9 November 2010 | 12 October 2009 |
| Cost | $499 | $79.99 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 1 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 244 Watt | 58 Watt |
The GeForce GTX 580 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
