RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 570

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 570 with RTX 6000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

GTX 570
2010
1280 MB GDDR5, 219 Watt
10.22

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms GTX 570 by a whopping 617% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking44415
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.177.43
Power efficiency3.2216.84
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF110AD102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 December 2010 (14 years ago)3 December 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 $6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation has 242% better value for money than GTX 570.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48018176
Core clock speed732 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2505 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Watt300 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate43.921,423
Floating-point processing power1.405 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs40192
TMUs60568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB48 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1900 MHz (3800 data rate)2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth152.0 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 570 10.22
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 73.26
+617%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 570 3928
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28157
+617%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 570 5033
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 70850
+1308%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 570 17632
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 126448
+617%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 570 4390
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 36679
+736%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 570 13327
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 323581
+2328%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80
−138%
190
+138%
1440p21−24
−662%
160
+662%
4K16−18
−619%
115
+619%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.36
+720%
35.78
−720%
1440p16.62
+156%
42.49
−156%
4K21.81
+171%
59.12
−171%
  • GTX 570 has 720% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 570 has 156% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 570 has 171% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−811%
164
+811%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−600%
140−150
+600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−255%
110−120
+255%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−806%
163
+806%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−600%
140−150
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−912%
400−450
+912%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−635%
190−200
+635%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−304%
113
+304%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−396%
130−140
+396%
Valorant 40−45
−863%
350−400
+863%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−255%
110−120
+255%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−761%
155
+761%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−600%
140−150
+600%
Dota 2 35−40
−359%
170−180
+359%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−193%
123
+193%
Fortnite 55−60
−393%
290−300
+393%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−912%
400−450
+912%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−635%
190−200
+635%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−359%
170−180
+359%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−279%
106
+279%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−172%
210−220
+172%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−396%
130−140
+396%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−461%
170−180
+461%
Valorant 40−45
−863%
350−400
+863%
World of Tanks 140−150
−91.1%
270−280
+91.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−255%
110−120
+255%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−717%
147
+717%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−600%
140−150
+600%
Dota 2 35−40
−603%
260−270
+603%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−226%
130−140
+226%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−912%
400−450
+912%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−635%
190−200
+635%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−172%
210−220
+172%
Valorant 40−45
−863%
350−400
+863%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
−992%
140−150
+992%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−907%
140−150
+907%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−257%
170−180
+257%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−933%
90−95
+933%
World of Tanks 70−75
−607%
500−550
+607%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−335%
85−90
+335%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−323%
131
+323%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−627%
160−170
+627%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−1096%
270−280
+1096%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−853%
140−150
+853%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−395%
99
+395%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1464%
219
+1464%
Valorant 24−27
−1216%
300−350
+1216%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−700%
40
+700%
Dota 2 21−24
−686%
160−170
+686%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−720%
160−170
+720%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1400%
90
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−597%
200−210
+597%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−814%
60−65
+814%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−725%
160−170
+725%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−911%
90−95
+911%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1760%
90−95
+1760%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Dota 2 21−24
−614%
150−160
+614%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−775%
100−110
+775%
Fortnite 10−12
−773%
95−100
+773%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Valorant 10−11
−1810%
190−200
+1810%

This is how GTX 570 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 138% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 662% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 619% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 1810% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 6000 Ada Generation surpassed GTX 570 in all 56 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.22 73.26
Recency 7 December 2010 3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 219 Watt 300 Watt

GTX 570 has 37% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 616.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 3740% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 570 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 570 is a desktop card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
GeForce GTX 570
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 495 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 103 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.