Quadro T1000 vs GeForce GTX 570

Place in performance ranking	410	299
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.61	8.55
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GF110	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	7 December 2010 (13 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$349	no data
Current price	$12.99 (0x MSRP)	$920

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 570 has 24% better value for money than Quadro T1000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	480	no data
CUDA cores	480	no data
Core clock speed	732 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1455 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	219 Watt	50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	43.9 billion/sec	no data
Floating-point performance	1,405.4 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI-E 2.0 x 16	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	Two 6-pin	None
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	1280 MB	no data
Memory bus width	320 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1900 MHz (3800 data rate)	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	152.0 GB/s	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	no data
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 570 10.15

Quadro T1000 16.97
+67.2%

Quadro T1000 outperforms GeForce GTX 570 by 67% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 570 3927

Quadro T1000 6567
+67.2%

Quadro T1000 outperforms GeForce GTX 570 by 67% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 570 13634

Quadro T1000 33818
+148%

Quadro T1000 outperforms GeForce GTX 570 by 148% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−64.4%

120−130
+64.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

−50%

24−27
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −59.1%	35−40 +59.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −66.7%	50−55 +66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −60.7%	45−50 +60.7%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −57.1%	55−60 +57.1%
Hitman 3	21−24 −52.2%	35−40 +52.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −61.8%	55−60 +61.8%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −66.7%	50−55 +66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −55.2%	45−50 +55.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −60.7%	45−50 +60.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −66.7%	30−33 +66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −59.1%	35−40 +59.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −66.7%	50−55 +66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −60.7%	45−50 +60.7%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −57.1%	55−60 +57.1%
Hitman 3	21−24 −52.2%	35−40 +52.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −61.8%	55−60 +61.8%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −66.7%	50−55 +66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −55.2%	45−50 +55.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −60.7%	45−50 +60.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −66.7%	30−33 +66.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −59.1%	35−40 +59.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −66.7%	50−55 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −57.1%	55−60 +57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −61.8%	55−60 +61.8%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −66.7%	50−55 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −66.7%	30−33 +66.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

−55.2%

45−50
+55.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −58.8%	27−30 +58.8%
Hitman 3	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	24−27 −66.7%	40−45 +66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Hitman 3	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Battlefield 5	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −61.5%	21−24 +61.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%