Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 570

Place in performance ranking	409	330
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.61	20.86
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Generation 12.7 (2022)
GPU code name	GF110	DG2-128
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	7 December 2010 (13 years ago)	14 June 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$349	$149
Current price	$12.99 (0x MSRP)	$591 (4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A380 has 97% better value for money than GTX 570.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	480	1024
CUDA cores	480	no data
Core clock speed	732 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	2050 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	219 Watt	75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	43.9 billion/sec	131.2
Floating-point performance	1,405.4 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 570 and Arc A380 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCI-E 2.0 x 16	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	Two 6-pin	1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1280 MB	6 GB
Memory bus width	320 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	1900 MHz (3800 data rate)	15.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	152.0 GB/s	186.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 570 10.15

Arc A380 14.46
+42.5%

Arc A380 outperforms GeForce GTX 570 by 42% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 570 3927

Arc A380 5292
+34.8%

Arc A380 outperforms GeForce GTX 570 by 35% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 570 17632
+73.3%

Arc A380 10174

GeForce GTX 570 outperforms Arc A380 by 73% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 570 5033

Arc A380 60804
+1108%

Arc A380 outperforms GeForce GTX 570 by 1108% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 570 4390

Arc A380 9728
+122%

Arc A380 outperforms GeForce GTX 570 by 122% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

80
+66.7%

−66.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

−31.3%

21−24
+31.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −190%	61 +190%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −233%	50 +233%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −44.1%	45−50 +44.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −37%	35−40 +37%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −148%	62 +148%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −133%	63 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −111%	76 +111%
Hitman 3	24−27 −50%	35−40 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −171%	57 +171%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −155%	56 +155%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −206%	55 +206%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −138%	50 +138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −147%	37 +147%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −44.1%	45−50 +44.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −37%	35−40 +37%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −128%	57 +128%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −119%	59 +119%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −100%	72 +100%
Hitman 3	24−27 −50%	35−40 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −105%	43 +105%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −167%	40 +167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −109%	46 +109%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −214%	66 +214%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −167%	48 +167%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −38.1%	29 +38.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −107%	31 +107%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −44.1%	45−50 +44.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −108%	52 +108%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −100%	54 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −58.3%	57 +58.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −61.9%	34 +61.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −38.9%	25 +38.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −40%	21−24 +40%
Hitman 3	16−18 −43.8%	21−24 +43.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −25%	20−22 +25%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −62.5%	12−14 +62.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −50%	14−16 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −43.8%	21−24 +43.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −52.9%	24−27 +52.9%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −55.6%	27−30 +55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −66.7%	14−16 +66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Hitman 3	9−10 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −62.5%	12−14 +62.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Battlefield 5	8−9 −87.5%	14−16 +87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −53.8%	20−22 +53.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%

This is how GTX 570 and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

GTX 570 is 66.7% faster than Arc A380 in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc A380 is 233% faster than the GTX 570.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Arc A380 surpassed GTX 570 in all 62 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.15	14.46
Recency	7 December 2010	14 June 2022
Cost	$349	$149
Maximum RAM amount	1280 MB	6 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	219 Watt	75 Watt