UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
560 OEM 560 Ti 448 570 570 Rev. 2 580 580 Rev. 2 590
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 with UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, including specs and performance data.

GTX 570 Rev. 2
2010, $349
1280 MB GDDR5, 219 Watt
6.55
+65.8%

570 Rev. 2 outperforms Graphics 750 32EUs by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 570 Rev. 2 GTX 570 Rev. 2
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking614748
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.92no data
Power efficiency2.30no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGF110Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 December 2010 (15 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48032
Core clock speed732 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Wattno data
Texture fill rate43.92no data
Floating-point processing power1.405 TFLOPSno data
ROPs40no data
TMUs60no data
L1 Cache960 KBno data
L2 Cache640 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1280 MBno data
Memory bus width320 Bitno data
Memory clock speed950 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth152.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
+50%
16
−50%

Cost per frame, $

1080p14.54no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 34
+0%
34
+0%
Far Cry 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 6
+0%
6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Dota 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GTX 570 Rev. 2 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compete in popular games:

  • GTX 570 Rev. 2 is 50% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 39 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.55 3.95
Recency 7 December 2010 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm

GTX 570 Rev. 2 has a 65.8% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 570 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 560 GeForce GTX 560
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
vs
R7 M380 Radeon R7 M380
GTX 570 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
vs
RX 550 Radeon RX 550
GTX 570 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
vs
GRID RTX T10-8 GRID RTX T10-8
GTX 570 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
vs
540 Mobile Radeon 540 Mobile
GTX 570 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
vs
Zhongshan Subor Z+ GPU Subor Z+ GPU
GTX 570 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
vs
Playstation 3 GPU 90nm 3 GPU 90nm
GTX 570 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
vs
Apple M1 GPU M1 GPU
GTX 570 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
vs
Vega 7 Vega 7
GTX 570 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
vs
ATI Mobility 7000 Radeon 7000
GTX 570 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
vs
Arc 3 A370M 3 A370M
GTX 570 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
vs
Pro V340 8 GB Pro V340 8 GB
GTX 570 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
vs
Graphics 384SP Mobile Graphics 384SP Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 9 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 or UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.