Radeon PRO W7700 vs GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 with Radeon PRO W7700, including specs and performance data.
PRO W7700 outperforms 570 Rev. 2 by a whopping 735% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 616 | 52 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.92 | 31.22 |
| Power efficiency | 2.30 | 22.16 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) |
| GPU code name | GF110 | Navi 32 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 7 December 2010 (15 years ago) | 13 November 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | $999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
PRO W7700 has 3293% better value for money than GTX 570 Rev. 2.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 480 | 3072 |
| Core clock speed | 732 MHz | 1900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2600 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 28,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 219 Watt | 190 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 499.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.405 TFLOPS | 31.95 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40 | 96 |
| TMUs | 60 | 192 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 48 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 768 KB |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 64 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 241 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB/s | 576.0 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.55 | 54.68 |
| Recency | 7 December 2010 | 13 November 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 219 Watt | 190 Watt |
PRO W7700 has a 735% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1180% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 15% lower power consumption.
The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
