Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 560M SLI with Tesla C2070, including specs and performance data.
Tesla C2070 outperforms GTX 560M SLI by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 579 | 520 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 4.50 | 2.35 |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | N12E-GS | GF100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 6 January 2011 (14 years ago) | 25 July 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 32.14 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 48 |
| TMUs | no data | 56 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 248 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 747 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x DVI |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 2.0 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
−23.1%
|
16−18
+23.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−23.1%
|
16−18
+23.1%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
−20%
|
24−27
+20%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
−23.1%
|
16−18
+23.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−23.1%
|
16−18
+23.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−11.1%
|
30−33
+11.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16
−14.3%
|
16−18
+14.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 16−18
−23.5%
|
21−24
+23.5%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
−10.5%
|
21−24
+10.5%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−22.7%
|
27−30
+22.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
−20%
|
24−27
+20%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
−23.1%
|
16−18
+23.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−23.1%
|
16−18
+23.1%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−17.4%
|
27−30
+17.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
−16.7%
|
35−40
+16.7%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
−15.4%
|
45−50
+15.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−11.1%
|
30−33
+11.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16
−14.3%
|
16−18
+14.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
−22.7%
|
27−30
+22.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 16−18
−23.5%
|
21−24
+23.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
−20.4%
|
65−70
+20.4%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
−10.5%
|
21−24
+10.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20−22
−20%
|
24−27
+20%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−22.7%
|
27−30
+22.7%
|
| World of Tanks | 100−110
−17.6%
|
120−130
+17.6%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
−20%
|
24−27
+20%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
−23.1%
|
16−18
+23.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−23.1%
|
16−18
+23.1%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−17.4%
|
27−30
+17.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
−16.7%
|
35−40
+16.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−11.1%
|
30−33
+11.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16
−14.3%
|
16−18
+14.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
−20.4%
|
65−70
+20.4%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−22.7%
|
27−30
+22.7%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
−21.6%
|
45−50
+21.6%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
| World of Tanks | 45−50
−17%
|
55−60
+17%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
−14.3%
|
16−18
+14.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−16.7%
|
14−16
+16.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
| Valorant | 16−18
−23.5%
|
21−24
+23.5%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| Dota 2 | 18−20
−16.7%
|
21−24
+16.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−23.5%
|
21−24
+23.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
−10.5%
|
21−24
+10.5%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
−23.5%
|
21−24
+23.5%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 18−20
−16.7%
|
21−24
+16.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
| Fortnite | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Valorant | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.24 | 7.75 |
| Recency | 6 January 2011 | 25 July 2011 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
GTX 560M SLI has 138% lower power consumption.
Tesla C2070, on the other hand, has a 24.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 6 months.
The Tesla C2070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560M SLI in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 560M SLI is a notebook card while Tesla C2070 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
