Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 560

Place in performance ranking	514	644
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.64	0.93
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)
GPU code name	GF114	Kaby Lake GT3e
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	17 May 2011 (13 years ago)	1 September 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	no data
Current price	$76 (0.4x MSRP)	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 560 has 76% better value for money than Iris Plus Graphics 655.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	336	48
Core clock speed	810 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	1,950 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	15 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	99 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	45.36	50.40
Floating-point performance	1,088.6 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 560 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	16x PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Length	8.25" (21 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	Two 6-pin	no data
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	+	no data
3D Gaming	+	no data
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.103
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 560 7.08
+68.6%

Iris Plus Graphics 655 4.20

GeForce GTX 560 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 655 by 69% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 560 2738
+57.5%

Iris Plus Graphics 655 1738

GeForce GTX 560 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 655 by 58% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 560 3030
+52.8%

Iris Plus Graphics 655 1983

GeForce GTX 560 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 655 by 53% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	35−40 +66.7%	21 −66.7%
1440p	24−27 +60%	15 −60%
4K	24−27 +50%	16 −50%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.08	4.20
Recency	17 May 2011	1 September 2017
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Chip lithography	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	15 Watt