GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs GTX 560

Aggregate performance score

GTX 560
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
7.09

RTX 4060 Mobile outperforms GTX 560 by a whopping 492% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking51681
Place by popularitynot in top-10054
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.64no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameGF114GN21-X4
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 May 2011 (13 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data
Current price$76 (0.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3363072
Core clock speed810 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2370 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Maximum GPU temperature99 °Cno data
Texture fill rate45.36181.4
Floating-point performance1,088.6 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 560 and GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length8.25" (21 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsTwo 6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMIPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
3D Gaming+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 560 7.09
RTX 4060 Mobile 41.98
+492%

RTX 4060 Mobile outperforms GTX 560 by 492% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 560 3030
RTX 4060 Mobile 26454
+773%

RTX 4060 Mobile outperforms GTX 560 by 773% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−528%
113
+528%
1440p10−12
−500%
60
+500%
4K6−7
−567%
40
+567%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 126
−456%
700−750
+456%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−448%
400−450
+448%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 135
−456%
750−800
+456%
Battlefield 5 130−140
−456%
750−800
+456%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−488%
500−550
+488%
Cyberpunk 2077 100
−450%
550−600
+450%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−462%
500−550
+462%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
−483%
600−650
+483%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−477%
900−950
+477%
Hitman 3 123
−469%
700−750
+469%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
−485%
1000−1050
+485%
Metro Exodus 110−120
−456%
650−700
+456%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
−456%
550−600
+456%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 267
−481%
1550−1600
+481%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−445%
550−600
+445%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−448%
400−450
+448%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 114
−470%
650−700
+470%
Battlefield 5 130−140
−456%
750−800
+456%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−488%
500−550
+488%
Cyberpunk 2077 85
−488%
500−550
+488%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−462%
500−550
+462%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
−483%
600−650
+483%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−477%
900−950
+477%
Hitman 3 59
−408%
300−310
+408%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
−485%
1000−1050
+485%
Metro Exodus 110−120
−456%
650−700
+456%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
−456%
550−600
+456%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 215
−481%
1250−1300
+481%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 195
−490%
1150−1200
+490%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−445%
550−600
+445%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−448%
400−450
+448%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 98
−461%
550−600
+461%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−488%
500−550
+488%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
−484%
450−500
+484%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−462%
500−550
+462%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−477%
900−950
+477%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
−485%
1000−1050
+485%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 185
−468%
1050−1100
+468%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 101
−445%
550−600
+445%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65
−438%
350−400
+438%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
−456%
550−600
+456%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−449%
450−500
+449%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
−456%
550−600
+456%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−487%
270−280
+487%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 72
−456%
400−450
+456%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−438%
350−400
+438%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
−492%
290−300
+492%
Far Cry 5 99
−456%
550−600
+456%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−462%
500−550
+462%
Hitman 3 55−60
−445%
300−310
+445%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−443%
500−550
+443%
Metro Exodus 75−80
−477%
450−500
+477%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 127
−491%
750−800
+491%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
−426%
400−450
+426%
Watch Dogs: Legion 44
−491%
260−270
+491%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
−456%
400−450
+456%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−481%
250−260
+481%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−483%
210−220
+483%
Hitman 3 30−35
−488%
200−210
+488%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−456%
300−310
+456%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 67
−422%
350−400
+422%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
−445%
300−310
+445%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−486%
170−180
+486%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−456%
150−160
+456%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−456%
150−160
+456%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
−479%
110−120
+479%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−460%
140−150
+460%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−408%
300−310
+408%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−456%
300−310
+456%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−478%
260−270
+478%
Watch Dogs: Legion 25
−460%
140−150
+460%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−479%
220−230
+479%

This is how GTX 560 and RTX 4060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 528% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 500% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 567% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.09 41.98
Recency 17 May 2011 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 115 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
GeForce GTX 560
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1000 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2350 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.