GeForce FX Go 5200 vs RTX 3070 Mobile

Place in the ranking	128	1493
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	22.37	no data
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	no data
GPU code name	GA104	NV31M
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	12 January 2021 (4 years ago)	1 March 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	5
Core clock speed	1110 MHz	1 MHz
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	300 MHz
Number of transistors	17,400 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	249.6	no data
Floating-point processing power	15.97 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	80	no data
TMUs	160	no data
Tensor Cores	160	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	40	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	300 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	DDR
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2	-
CUDA	8.6	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3070 Mobile 35.94
+179600%

FX Go 5200 0.02

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3070 Mobile 14364
+179450%

FX Go 5200 8

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	115	-0−1
1440p	73	-0−1
4K	45	-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	122 +1256%	9−10 −1256%
Cyberpunk 2077	119 +5850%	2−3 −5850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	99 +1000%	9−10 −1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	97 +4750%	2−3 −4750%
Forza Horizon 4	224 +4380%	5−6 −4380%
Forza Horizon 5	140	0−1
Metro Exodus	112	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 +2367%	3−4 −2367%
Valorant	140−150	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	85 +844%	9−10 −844%
Cyberpunk 2077	80 +3900%	2−3 −3900%
Dota 2	127	0−1
Far Cry 5	79 +1480%	5−6 −1480%
Fortnite	160−170	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	183 +3560%	5−6 −3560%
Forza Horizon 5	118	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	125	0−1
Metro Exodus	91	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +4825%	4−5 −4825%
Red Dead Redemption 2	66 +2100%	3−4 −2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	130−140 +3175%	4−5 −3175%
Valorant	98	0−1
World of Tanks	270−280 +3388%	8−9 −3388%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	75 +733%	9−10 −733%
Cyberpunk 2077	68 +3300%	2−3 −3300%
Dota 2	120	0−1
Far Cry 5	95−100 +1800%	5−6 −1800%
Forza Horizon 4	168 +3260%	5−6 −3260%
Forza Horizon 5	106	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +4825%	4−5 −4825%
Valorant	183	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−33	0−1
Dota 2	83	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	83	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	38	0−1
World of Tanks	230−240	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	43 +1333%	3−4 −1333%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +2900%	4−5 −2900%
Forza Horizon 4	125	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	78	0−1
Metro Exodus	91	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +2033%	3−4 −2033%
Valorant	118 +2850%	4−5 −2850%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +229%	7−8 −229%
Dota 2	83 +453%	14−16 −453%
Grand Theft Auto V	83 +453%	14−16 −453%
Metro Exodus	37	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	24	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	83 +453%	14−16 −453%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	10 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	20 +900%	2−3 −900%
Dota 2	109 +627%	14−16 −627%
Far Cry 5	50−55	0−1
Fortnite	50−55	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	71	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	44	0−1
Valorant	64	0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 3070 Mobile is 5850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 3070 Mobile surpassed FX Go 5200 in all 30 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	35.94	0.02
Recency	12 January 2021	1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 MB
Chip lithography	8 nm	150 nm

RTX 3070 Mobile has a 179600% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX Go 5200 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.