GeForce RTX 3090 vs GTX 560 Ti

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 560 Ti and GeForce RTX 3090, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 560 Ti
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 170 Watt
7.88

RTX 3090 outperforms GTX 560 Ti by a whopping 780% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking49019
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.8216.77
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGF114Ampere GA102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 January 2011 (13 years ago)24 September 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $1,499
Current price$130 (0.5x MSRP)$1198 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3090 has 821% better value for money than GTX 560 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38410496
Core clock speed822 MHz1400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate52.67556.0
Floating-point performance1,263.4 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mm313 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2004 MHz19500 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.3 GB/s936.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.18.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 560 Ti 7.88
RTX 3090 69.38
+780%

RTX 3090 outperforms GTX 560 Ti by 780% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 560 Ti 3042
RTX 3090 26795
+781%

RTX 3090 outperforms GTX 560 Ti by 781% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 560 Ti 4013
RTX 3090 61518
+1433%

RTX 3090 outperforms GTX 560 Ti by 1433% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 560 Ti 15494
RTX 3090 124350
+703%

RTX 3090 outperforms GTX 560 Ti by 703% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 560 Ti 3470
RTX 3090 47241
+1261%

RTX 3090 outperforms GTX 560 Ti by 1261% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 560 Ti 10882
RTX 3090 188828
+1635%

RTX 3090 outperforms GTX 560 Ti by 1635% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p63
−773%
550−600
+773%
Full HD59
−231%
195
+231%
1440p14−16
−850%
133
+850%
4K10−12
−790%
89
+790%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11 no data
Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Hitman 3 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 21−24 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11 no data
Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Hitman 3 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 21−24 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
Hitman 3 10−12 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18 no data
Metro Exodus 10−11 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6 no data
Hitman 3 4−5 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9 no data
Metro Exodus 8−9 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9 no data

This is how GTX 560 Ti and RTX 3090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3090 is 773% faster in 900p
  • RTX 3090 is 231% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3090 is 850% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3090 is 790% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.88 69.38
Recency 25 January 2011 24 September 2020
Cost $249 $1499
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 350 Watt

The GeForce RTX 3090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560 Ti in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 772 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 78582 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.