GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs GTX 560 Ti

Place in the ranking	522	216
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.84	no data
Power efficiency	3.23	26.89
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GF114	TU106
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	25 January 2011 (14 years ago)	29 January 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$249	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	1920
Core clock speed	823 MHz	975 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1185 MHz
Number of transistors	1,950 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	52.67	142.2
Floating-point processing power	1.263 TFLOPS	4.55 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	48
TMUs	64	120
Tensor Cores	no data	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	229 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1002 MHz	1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	128.3 GB/s	264.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	No outputs
HDMI	+	-
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	2.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 560 Ti 7.95

RTX 2060 Max-Q 25.34
+219%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 560 Ti 3056

RTX 2060 Max-Q 9741
+219%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 560 Ti 4013

RTX 2060 Max-Q 19779
+393%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 560 Ti 15494

RTX 2060 Max-Q 50957
+229%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 560 Ti 3470

RTX 2060 Max-Q 14910
+330%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	63 −217%	200−210 +217%
Full HD	63 −49.2%	94 +49.2%
1440p	10−12 −240%	34 +240%
4K	12−14 −242%	41 +242%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.95	no data
1440p	24.90	no data
4K	20.75	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −236%	45−50 +236%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −225%	50−55 +225%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −208%	75−80 +208%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −236%	45−50 +236%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −225%	50−55 +225%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −306%	130 +306%
Forza Horizon 5	18−20 −253%	65−70 +253%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −257%	75 +257%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −323%	93 +323%
Valorant	27−30 −276%	109 +276%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −208%	75−80 +208%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −236%	45−50 +236%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −225%	50−55 +225%
Dota 2	27−30 −264%	102 +264%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −120%	77 +120%
Fortnite	45−50 −170%	120−130 +170%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −231%	106 +231%
Forza Horizon 5	18−20 −253%	65−70 +253%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 −236%	94 +236%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −171%	57 +171%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 −273%	235 +273%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −150%	55−60 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −242%	80−85 +242%
Valorant	27−30 −162%	76 +162%
World of Tanks	120−130 −116%	250−260 +116%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −208%	75−80 +208%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −236%	45−50 +236%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −225%	50−55 +225%
Dota 2	27−30 −311%	115 +311%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −120%	75−80 +120%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −191%	93 +191%
Forza Horizon 5	18−20 −253%	65−70 +253%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 −151%	150−160 +151%
Valorant	27−30 −221%	93 +221%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	9−10 −378%	40−45 +378%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−11 −330%	40−45 +330%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −338%	170−180 +338%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −283%	21−24 +283%
World of Tanks	55−60 −193%	160−170 +193%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −264%	50−55 +264%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −267%	21−24 +267%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −335%	70−75 +335%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −300%	65−70 +300%
Forza Horizon 5	12−14 −242%	40−45 +242%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −346%	55−60 +346%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −245%	35−40 +245%
Valorant	20−22 −245%	65−70 +245%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −1050%	21−24 +1050%
Dota 2	18−20 −132%	40−45 +132%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −144%	40−45 +144%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −567%	20−22 +567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −239%	75−80 +239%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −220%	16−18 +220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −144%	40−45 +144%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −286%	27−30 +286%
Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −1050%	21−24 +1050%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Dota 2	18−20 −316%	79 +316%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −278%	30−35 +278%
Fortnite	8−9 −300%	30−35 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −333%	35−40 +333%
Forza Horizon 5	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Valorant	8−9 −313%	30−35 +313%

This is how GTX 560 Ti and RTX 2060 Max-Q compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 Max-Q is 217% faster in 900p
RTX 2060 Max-Q is 49% faster in 1080p
RTX 2060 Max-Q is 240% faster in 1440p
RTX 2060 Max-Q is 242% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 Max-Q is 1050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2060 Max-Q is ahead in 63 tests (98%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.95	25.34
Recency	25 January 2011	29 January 2020
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	65 Watt

RTX 2060 Max-Q has a 218.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 161.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 Ti is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.