GeForce RTX 2070 vs GTX 560 Ti 448

Place in the ranking	513	95
Place by popularity	not in top-100	100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.70	32.77
Power efficiency	2.71	16.52
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GF110	TU106
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	29 November 2011 (13 years ago)	17 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$289	$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 has 1828% better value for money than GTX 560 Ti 448.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	448	2304
Core clock speed	732 MHz	1410 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1620 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	210 Watt	175 Watt
Texture fill rate	40.99	233.3
Floating-point processing power	1.312 TFLOPS	7.465 TFLOPS
ROPs	40	64
TMUs	56	144
Tensor Cores	no data	288
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	229 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1280 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	320 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	950 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	152.0 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	+	+
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	2.0	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 560 Ti 448 8.17

RTX 2070 41.46
+407%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 560 Ti 448 4210

RTX 2070 23186
+451%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	24−27 −438%	129 +438%
1440p	16−18 −450%	88 +450%
4K	12−14 −417%	62 +417%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	12.04 −211%	3.87 +211%
1440p	18.06 −219%	5.67 +219%
4K	24.08 −199%	8.05 +199%

RTX 2070 has 211% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RTX 2070 has 219% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RTX 2070 has 199% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90 +0%	90 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	45 +0%	45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Metro Exodus	103 +0%	103 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110 +0%	110 +0%
Valorant	208 +0%	208 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160 +0%	160 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	37 +0%	37 +0%
Dota 2	130 +0%	130 +0%
Far Cry 5	93 +0%	93 +0%
Fortnite	166 +0%	166 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	127 +0%	127 +0%
Metro Exodus	80 +0%	80 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	245 +0%	245 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65 +0%	65 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Valorant	125 +0%	125 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	79 +0%	79 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	32 +0%	32 +0%
Dota 2	130 +0%	130 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	132 +0%	132 +0%
Valorant	184 +0%	184 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	42 +0%	42 +0%
World of Tanks	260−270 +0%	260−270 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	76 +0%	76 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	21 +0%	21 +0%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Metro Exodus	82 +0%	82 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Valorant	127 +0%	127 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Dota 2	86 +0%	86 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	86 +0%	86 +0%
Metro Exodus	32 +0%	32 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	128 +0%	128 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27 +0%	27 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	86 +0%	86 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	48 +0%	48 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 +0%	10 +0%
Dota 2	116 +0%	116 +0%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Fortnite	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Valorant	68 +0%	68 +0%

This is how GTX 560 Ti 448 and RTX 2070 compete in popular games:

RTX 2070 is 438% faster in 1080p
RTX 2070 is 450% faster in 1440p
RTX 2070 is 417% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.17	41.46
Recency	29 November 2011	17 October 2018
Maximum RAM amount	1280 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	210 Watt	175 Watt

RTX 2070 has a 407.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 540% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.