UHD Graphics 770 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 550 Ti and UHD Graphics 770, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 550 Ti
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 116 Watt
4.04

UHD Graphics 770 outperforms GTX 550 Ti by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking697583
Place by popularity6531
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.78no data
Power efficiency2.4028.38
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGF116Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date15 March 2011 (13 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192256
Core clock speed900 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)116 Watt15 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature100 °Cno data
Texture fill rate28.8026.40
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs3216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Length210 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed4.1 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth98.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMIMotherboard Dependent
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 550 Ti 4.04
UHD Graphics 770 6.17
+52.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 550 Ti 1554
+53%
UHD Graphics 770 1016

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 550 Ti 2272
UHD Graphics 770 16443
+624%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 550 Ti 10229
+285%
UHD Graphics 770 2655

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p38
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Full HD36
+89.5%
19
−89.5%
4K9−10
−55.6%
14
+55.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.14no data
4K16.56no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−50%
12
+50%
Elden Ring 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−72.7%
18−20
+72.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−27.8%
23
+27.8%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Valorant 7−8
−129%
16
+129%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−72.7%
18−20
+72.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+83.3%
6
−83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Dota 2 12−14
−66.7%
20
+66.7%
Elden Ring 9−10
−22.2%
11
+22.2%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−42.9%
30
+42.9%
Fortnite 21−24
−56.5%
35−40
+56.5%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+33.3%
9
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−45.7%
50−55
+45.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
Valorant 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
World of Tanks 65−70
−44.1%
95−100
+44.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−72.7%
18−20
+72.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Dota 2 12−14
−233%
40
+233%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−33.3%
27−30
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+12.5%
16
−12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−45.7%
50−55
+45.7%
Valorant 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Elden Ring 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−32.1%
35−40
+32.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
World of Tanks 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Valorant 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Elden Ring 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 16−18
+14.3%
14
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Fortnite 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Valorant 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GTX 550 Ti and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 770 is 45% faster in 900p
  • GTX 550 Ti is 89% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics 770 is 56% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 550 Ti is 83% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 550 Ti is ahead in 5 tests (8%)
  • UHD Graphics 770 is ahead in 53 tests (87%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.04 6.17
Recency 15 March 2011 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 116 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has a 52.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 673.3% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 770 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 550 Ti in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 59538 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 550 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1283 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.