Radeon R7 M275DX vs GeForce GTX 485M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon R7 M275DX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 485M
2010
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
6.11
+81.3%

GTX 485M outperforms R7 M275DX by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking550700
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.44no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameN12E-GTX-A1no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2010 (14 years ago)4 June 2014 (10 years ago)
Current price$163 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384896
Core clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate36.8 billion/secno data
Floating-point performance883.2 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon R7 M275DX compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Eyefinityno data+
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAccelerationno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/Ano data
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 485M 6.11
+81.3%
R7 M275DX 3.37

GeForce GTX 485M outperforms Radeon R7 M275DX by 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 485M 2709
R7 M275DX 3553
+31.2%

Radeon R7 M275DX outperforms GeForce GTX 485M by 31% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 485M 13536
+62.9%
R7 M275DX 8309

GeForce GTX 485M outperforms Radeon R7 M275DX by 63% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p48
+100%
24−27
−100%
Full HD61
+135%
26
−135%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8 no data
Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 no data
Hitman 3 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8 no data
Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 no data
Hitman 3 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 no data
Hitman 3 10−11 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5 no data
Hitman 3 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7 no data
Metro Exodus 7−8 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data

This is how GTX 485M and R7 M275DX compete in popular games:

  • GTX 485M is 100% faster in 900p
  • GTX 485M is 135% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.11 3.37
Recency 6 January 2010 4 June 2014
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

The GeForce GTX 485M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M275DX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
GeForce GTX 485M
AMD Radeon R7 M275DX
Radeon R7 M275DX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 485M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M275DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.