GeForce 9400 vs GTX 485M

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	547	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	3.30	no data
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	N12E-GTX-A1	C79
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	6 January 2010 (14 years ago)	17 April 2007 (17 years ago)
Current price	$163	$190

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	16
Core clock speed	1150 MHz	450 MHz
Number of transistors	1,950 million	314 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	36.8 billion/sec	3.600
Floating-point performance	883.2 gflops	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 485M and GeForce 9400 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCI
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data
SLI options	+	no data

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	96.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.1	4.0
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & Cons Summary

---

Recency	6 January 2010	17 April 2007
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Chip lithography	40 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	40 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---