Radeon RX 6600 XT vs GeForce GTX 485M SLI

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 485M SLI with Radeon RX 6600 XT, including specs and performance data.

GTX 485M SLI
2011
2x2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.18

RX 6600 XT outperforms GTX 485M SLI by a whopping 366% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking47490
Place by popularitynot in top-10087
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data63.46
Power efficiency6.3518.52
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameN11E-GTX-A1Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2011 (13 years ago)30 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed575 MHz1968 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2589 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rateno data331.4
Floating-point processing powerno data10.6 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 485M SLI 9.18
RX 6600 XT 42.80
+366%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 485M SLI 5334
RX 6600 XT 39051
+632%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 485M SLI 24830
RX 6600 XT 88163
+255%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p89
−349%
400−450
+349%
Full HD101
−33.7%
135
+33.7%
1440p16−18
−381%
77
+381%
4K9−10
−378%
43
+378%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.81
1440pno data4.92
4Kno data8.81

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−464%
79
+464%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−309%
90−95
+309%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−892%
129
+892%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−389%
130−140
+389%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−353%
85−90
+353%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−457%
78
+457%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−333%
90−95
+333%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−304%
100−110
+304%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−226%
190−200
+226%
Hitman 3 18−20
−500%
108
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−241%
170−180
+241%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−359%
130−140
+359%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−273%
95−100
+273%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−430%
150−160
+430%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−118%
130−140
+118%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−309%
90−95
+309%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−715%
106
+715%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−389%
130−140
+389%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−353%
85−90
+353%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−443%
76
+443%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−333%
90−95
+333%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−304%
100−110
+304%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−226%
190−200
+226%
Hitman 3 18−20
−500%
108
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−241%
170−180
+241%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−359%
130−140
+359%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−273%
95−100
+273%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−597%
209
+597%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−252%
85−90
+252%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−118%
130−140
+118%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−309%
90−95
+309%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−477%
75
+477%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−353%
85−90
+353%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−393%
69
+393%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−333%
90−95
+333%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−226%
190−200
+226%
Hitman 3 18−20
−456%
100
+456%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−208%
157
+208%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−510%
183
+510%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−296%
99
+296%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+0%
61
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−273%
95−100
+273%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−361%
80−85
+361%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−422%
45−50
+422%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1020%
56
+1020%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−900%
40
+900%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−345%
45−50
+345%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−503%
230−240
+503%
Hitman 3 12−14
−458%
67
+458%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−511%
116
+511%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−654%
98
+654%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−973%
118
+973%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−611%
60−65
+611%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−242%
200−210
+242%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−393%
70−75
+393%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−438%
40−45
+438%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−517%
35−40
+517%
Hitman 3 5−6
−560%
33
+560%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−416%
190−200
+416%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−700%
55−60
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−800%
54
+800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−600%
28
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−600%
27−30
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14
+1300%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−1120%
61
+1120%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−700%
24
+700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−333%
35−40
+333%

This is how GTX 485M SLI and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is 349% faster in 900p
  • RX 6600 XT is 34% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 XT is 381% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600 XT is 378% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is ahead in 71 test (99%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.18 42.80
Recency 6 January 2011 30 July 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 160 Watt

GTX 485M SLI has 60% lower power consumption.

RX 6600 XT, on the other hand, has a 366.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 485M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 485M SLI is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
GeForce GTX 485M SLI
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 485M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4221 vote

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.