Radeon RX 6750 XT vs GeForce GTX 485M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 485M SLI with Radeon RX 6750 XT, including specs and performance data.

GTX 485M SLI
2011
2x2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.22

RX 6750 XT outperforms GTX 485M SLI by a whopping 483% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking44440
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.8630.09
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN11E-GTX-A1Navi 22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2011 (13 years ago)3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549
Current price$149 $559 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6750 XT has 240% better value for money than GTX 485M SLI.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682560
Core clock speed575 MHz2150 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data416.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 485M SLI and Radeon RX 6750 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkanno data1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 485M SLI 9.22
RX 6750 XT 53.77
+483%

Radeon RX 6750 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 485M SLI by 483% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 485M SLI 5334
RX 6750 XT 48327
+806%

Radeon RX 6750 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 485M SLI by 806% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 485M SLI 24830
RX 6750 XT 104004
+319%

Radeon RX 6750 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 485M SLI by 319% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p89
−462%
500−550
+462%
Full HD95
−66.3%
158
+66.3%
1440p14−16
−529%
88
+529%
4K8−9
−550%
52
+550%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 no data
Battlefield 5 27−30 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Hitman 3 16−18 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 27−30 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 no data
Battlefield 5 27−30 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Hitman 3 16−18 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 27−30 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
Hitman 3 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Metro Exodus 12−14 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7 no data
Hitman 3 5−6 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11 no data
Metro Exodus 9−10 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 no data

This is how GTX 485M SLI and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 462% faster in 900p
  • RX 6750 XT is 66% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 529% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT is 550% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.22 53.77
Recency 6 January 2011 3 March 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 250 Watt

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 485M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 485M SLI is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
GeForce GTX 485M SLI
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 485M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2213 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.