Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs GeForce GTX 480M

Place in the ranking	685	861
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.87	21.25
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	no data
GPU code name	GF100	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	25 May 2010 (14 years ago)	6 December 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	352	no data
Core clock speed	425 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,100 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	7 Watt
Texture fill rate	18.70	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.5984 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	44	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1200 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.5	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 480M 4.19
+93.1%

Qualcomm Adreno 680 2.17

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 480M 1617
+93.4%

Qualcomm Adreno 680 836

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 480M 2185
+12.9%

Qualcomm Adreno 680 1936

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	33 +106%	16−18 −106%
Full HD	40 +122%	18−21 −122%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8
+40%

5−6

−40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Battlefield 5	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +78.6%	14−16 −78.6%
Hitman 3	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +33.3%	21−24 −33.3%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +13.2%	35−40 −13.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Battlefield 5	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +78.6%	14−16 −78.6%
Hitman 3	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +33.3%	21−24 −33.3%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +13.2%	35−40 −13.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +78.6%	14−16 −78.6%
Hitman 3	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +33.3%	21−24 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +13.2%	35−40 −13.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12
+57.1%

7−8

−57.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Hitman 3	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +62.5%	16−18 −62.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
+33.3%

6−7

−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Hitman 3	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2	0−1
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
+25%

4−5

−25%

This is how GTX 480M and Qualcomm Adreno 680 compete in popular games:

GTX 480M is 106% faster in 900p
GTX 480M is 122% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 480M is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, GTX 480M surpassed Qualcomm Adreno 680 in all 60 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.19	2.17
Recency	25 May 2010	6 December 2018
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	7 Watt

GTX 480M has a 93.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Qualcomm Adreno 680, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1328.6% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 480M is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm Adreno 680 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.