GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs GTX 480M

Place in the ranking	685	5
Place by popularity	not in top-100	61
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	38.32
Power efficiency	2.88	19.10
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GF100	AD103
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	25 May 2010 (14 years ago)	8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	352	10240
Core clock speed	425 MHz	2295 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2550 MHz
Number of transistors	3,100 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	320 Watt
Texture fill rate	18.70	816.0
Floating-point processing power	0.5984 TFLOPS	52.22 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	112
TMUs	44	320
Tensor Cores	no data	320
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	310 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1200 MHz	1438 MHz
Memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	736.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.8
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	+	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 480M 4.20

RTX 4080 SUPER 89.01
+2019%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 480M 1617

RTX 4080 SUPER 34281
+2020%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 480M 2185

RTX 4080 SUPER 87055
+3885%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 480M 8872

RTX 4080 SUPER 141652
+1497%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	33 −1870%	650−700 +1870%
Full HD	40 −553%	261 +553%
1440p	8−9 −2163%	181 +2163%
4K	5−6 −2240%	117 +2240%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.83
1440p	no data	5.52
4K	no data	8.54

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8
−1900%

140−150

+1900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −1858%	235 +1858%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −9267%	281 +9267%
Battlefield 5	10−11 −2340%	240−250 +2340%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −1233%	120−130 +1233%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1900%	140−150 +1900%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −1211%	110−120 +1211%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −1575%	200−210 +1575%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −956%	260−270 +956%
Hitman 3	10−11 −1190%	120−130 +1190%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −1014%	300−350 +1014%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −1838%	150−160 +1838%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −1027%	120−130 +1027%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −2381%	350−400 +2381%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −258%	150−160 +258%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −2750%	342 +2750%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −7800%	237 +7800%
Battlefield 5	10−11 −2340%	240−250 +2340%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −1233%	120−130 +1233%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1900%	140−150 +1900%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −1211%	110−120 +1211%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −1575%	200−210 +1575%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −956%	260−270 +956%
Hitman 3	10−11 −1190%	120−130 +1190%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −1014%	300−350 +1014%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −1838%	150−160 +1838%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −1027%	120−130 +1027%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −3450%	568 +3450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −1169%	200−210 +1169%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −258%	150−160 +258%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −1217%	158 +1217%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −6867%	209 +6867%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −1233%	120−130 +1233%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1900%	140−150 +1900%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −1211%	110−120 +1211%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −1188%	322 +1188%
Hitman 3	10−11 −1190%	120−130 +1190%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −1418%	425 +1418%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −3194%	527 +3194%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −1544%	263 +1544%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −237%	145 +237%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

−1027%

120−130
+1027%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −1975%	160−170 +1975%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −1767%	110−120 +1767%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −3275%	135 +3275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −2633%	80−85 +2633%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1900%	40−45 +1900%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1580%	80−85 +1580%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −4417%	270−280 +4417%
Hitman 3	9−10 −1333%	120−130 +1333%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −3350%	345 +3350%
Metro Exodus	0−1	171
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −7267%	221 +7267%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −823%	240−250 +823%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

−1513%

120−130
+1513%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −2833%	85−90 +2833%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −2200%	65−70 +2200%
Hitman 3	0−1	80−85
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −8400%	85 +8400%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −14100%	140−150 +14100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −3100%	96 +3100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −4850%	99 +4850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2500%	50−55 +2500%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −10067%	305 +10067%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −8000%	81 +8000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−2120%

110−120
+2120%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	165 +0%	165 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	397 +0%	397 +0%

4K
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

204

+0%

204

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

201

+0%

201

+0%

This is how GTX 480M and RTX 4080 SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4080 SUPER is 1870% faster in 900p
RTX 4080 SUPER is 553% faster in 1080p
RTX 4080 SUPER is 2163% faster in 1440p
RTX 4080 SUPER is 2240% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4080 SUPER is 14100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4080 SUPER is ahead in 60 tests (94%)
there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.20	89.01
Recency	25 May 2010	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	320 Watt

GTX 480M has 220% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 2019.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 480M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 480M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.