Arc A580 vs GeForce GTX 470M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 470M with Arc A580, including specs and performance data.

GTX 470M
2010
1536 MB GDDR5, 75 Watt
5.06

Arc A580 outperforms GTX 470M by a whopping 498% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking624182
Place by popularitynot in top-10082
Power efficiency4.7012.06
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGF104DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)10 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2883072
Core clock speed535 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate25.68384.0
Floating-point processing power0.6163 TFLOPS12.29 TFLOPS
ROPs2496
TMUs48192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth60.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 470M 5.06
Arc A580 30.27
+498%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 470M 1953
Arc A580 11677
+498%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 470M 2003
Arc A580 35210
+1658%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 470M 9801
Arc A580 95677
+876%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p34
−488%
200−210
+488%
Full HD50
−110%
105
+110%
1440p9−10
−511%
55
+511%
4K5−6
−560%
33
+560%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−636%
103
+636%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1600%
85
+1600%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−923%
130−140
+923%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−664%
80−85
+664%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−709%
85−90
+709%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−629%
100−110
+629%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−516%
190−200
+516%
Hitman 3 10−12
−709%
85−90
+709%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−434%
170−180
+434%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−992%
130−140
+992%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−631%
95−100
+631%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−756%
150−160
+756%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−181%
130−140
+181%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−629%
102
+629%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1360%
73
+1360%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−923%
130−140
+923%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−664%
80−85
+664%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−709%
85−90
+709%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−629%
100−110
+629%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−516%
190−200
+516%
Hitman 3 10−12
−709%
85−90
+709%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−434%
170−180
+434%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−992%
130−140
+992%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−631%
95−100
+631%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−1089%
214
+1089%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−378%
85−90
+378%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−181%
130−140
+181%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−357%
64
+357%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1180%
64
+1180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−664%
80−85
+664%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−709%
85−90
+709%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−172%
87
+172%
Hitman 3 10−12
−709%
85−90
+709%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−241%
109
+241%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−883%
177
+883%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−278%
68
+278%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−27.7%
60
+27.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−631%
95−100
+631%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−800%
80−85
+800%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−700%
60−65
+700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−980%
54
+980%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1125%
45−50
+1125%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−700%
45−50
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1991%
230−240
+1991%
Hitman 3 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−691%
87
+691%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2933%
91
+2933%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1275%
55
+1275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−519%
190−200
+519%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−700%
70−75
+700%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−950%
40−45
+950%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Hitman 3 1−2
−3300%
30−35
+3300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−2586%
180−190
+2586%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−2600%
50−55
+2600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6000%
61
+6000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1067%
35
+1067%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1400%
30
+1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1300%
56
+1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−2600%
27
+2600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−517%
35−40
+517%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 51
+0%
51
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130
+0%
130
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73
+0%
73
+0%

This is how GTX 470M and Arc A580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A580 is 488% faster in 900p
  • Arc A580 is 110% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A580 is 511% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A580 is 560% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A580 is 6000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A580 is ahead in 63 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.06 30.27
Recency 3 September 2010 10 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 175 Watt

GTX 470M has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Arc A580, on the other hand, has a 498.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A580 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 470M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 470M is a notebook card while Arc A580 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
GeForce GTX 470M
Intel Arc A580
Arc A580

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 470M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 253 votes

Rate Arc A580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.