T400 vs GeForce GTX 470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 470 with T400, including specs and performance data.

GTX 470
2010
1280 MB GDDR5, 215 Watt
8.07

T400 outperforms GTX 470 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking517472
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.33no data
Power efficiency2.5721.46
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF100TU117
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date26 March 2010 (14 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448384
Core clock speed607 MHz420 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt30 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate34.0534.20
Floating-point processing power1.089 TFLOPS1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs4016
TMUs5624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB2 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1674 MHz (3348 data rate)1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth133.9 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMI3x mini-DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 470 8.07
T400 9.39
+16.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 470 3110
T400 3621
+16.4%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 470 10940
T400 16959
+55%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p55
−9.1%
60−65
+9.1%
Full HD64
−9.4%
70−75
+9.4%
1200p53
−13.2%
60−65
+13.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.45no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−11.1%
60−65
+11.1%
Hitman 3 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−8.7%
50−55
+8.7%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−14%
65−70
+14%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−11.1%
60−65
+11.1%
Hitman 3 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−8.7%
50−55
+8.7%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−14%
65−70
+14%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−11.1%
60−65
+11.1%
Hitman 3 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−8.7%
50−55
+8.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−14%
65−70
+14%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Hitman 3 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%

This is how GTX 470 and T400 compete in popular games:

  • T400 is 9% faster in 900p
  • T400 is 9% faster in 1080p
  • T400 is 13% faster in 1200p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.07 9.39
Recency 26 March 2010 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 30 Watt

T400 has a 16.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 616.7% lower power consumption.

The T400 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 470 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 470 is a desktop card while T400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
GeForce GTX 470
NVIDIA T400
T400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 317 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 377 votes

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.