Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX 470

Place in the ranking	514	176
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.28	55.32
Power efficiency	2.60	9.60
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	GF100	DG2-512
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	26 March 2010 (14 years ago)	12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$349	$289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A750 has 4222% better value for money than GTX 470.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	448	3584
Core clock speed	607 MHz	2050 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	3,100 million	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	215 Watt	225 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	34.05	537.6
Floating-point processing power	1.089 TFLOPS	17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs	40	112
TMUs	56	224
Tensor Cores	no data	448
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	16x PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	241 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1280 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	320 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1674 MHz (3348 data rate)	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	133.9 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 470 8.05

Arc A750 31.08
+286%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 470 3106

Arc A750 11991
+286%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 470 4342

Arc A750 37288
+759%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 470 16753

Arc A750 98837
+490%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 470 2758

Arc A750 29667
+976%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 470 25757

Arc A750 130715
+407%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	55 −282%	210−220 +282%
Full HD	64 −71.9%	110 +71.9%
1200p	53 −277%	200−210 +277%
1440p	14−16 −321%	59 +321%
4K	9−10 −300%	36 +300%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.45	2.63
1440p	24.93	4.90
4K	38.78	8.03

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

−285%

50−55
+285%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −210%	62 +210%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −718%	90 +718%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −488%	140−150 +488%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −450%	85−90 +450%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −285%	50−55 +285%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −411%	90−95 +411%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −370%	100−110 +370%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −274%	200−210 +274%
Hitman 3	16−18 −488%	90−95 +488%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −287%	170−180 +287%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −500%	144 +500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −350%	95−100 +350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −511%	160−170 +511%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −137%	130−140 +137%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −430%	106 +430%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −591%	76 +591%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −488%	140−150 +488%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −450%	85−90 +450%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −285%	50−55 +285%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −411%	90−95 +411%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −370%	100−110 +370%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −274%	200−210 +274%
Hitman 3	16−18 −488%	90−95 +488%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −287%	170−180 +287%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −496%	143 +496%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −350%	95−100 +350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −785%	239 +785%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −296%	90−95 +296%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −137%	130−140 +137%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −125%	45 +125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −527%	69 +527%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −450%	85−90 +450%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −285%	50−55 +285%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −411%	90−95 +411%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −66.7%	90 +66.7%
Hitman 3	16−18 −488%	90−95 +488%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −146%	113 +146%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −637%	199 +637%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −200%	69 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −10.5%	63 +10.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−350%

95−100
+350%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −438%	85−90 +438%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −458%	65−70 +458%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −375%	38 +375%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −1250%	54 +1250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −550%	50−55 +550%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −467%	50−55 +467%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −671%	230−240 +671%
Hitman 3	10−12 −427%	55−60 +427%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −441%	92 +441%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −760%	86 +760%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −1971%	145 +1971%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −714%	57 +714%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −300%	200−210 +300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−443%

75−80
+443%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −543%	45−50 +543%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −533%	35−40 +533%
Hitman 3	4−5 −800%	35−40 +800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −569%	190−200 +569%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −1233%	80 +1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −1280%	69 +1280%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −460%	28 +460%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −900%	30 +900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −625%	27−30 +625%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −550%	24−27 +550%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −578%	61 +578%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 −2700%	84 +2700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −900%	30 +900%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

−400%

40−45
+400%

This is how GTX 470 and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

Arc A750 is 282% faster in 900p
Arc A750 is 72% faster in 1080p
Arc A750 is 277% faster in 1200p
Arc A750 is 321% faster in 1440p
Arc A750 is 300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A750 is 2700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Arc A750 surpassed GTX 470 in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.05	31.08
Recency	26 March 2010	12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount	1280 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	215 Watt	225 Watt

GTX 470 has 4.7% lower power consumption.

Arc A750, on the other hand, has a 286.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 540% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A750 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 470 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.