UHD Graphics 630 vs GeForce GTX 465

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 465
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
6.89
+123%

GeForce GTX 465 outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by a whopping 123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking526723
Place by popularitynot in top-10029
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.460.35
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Gen. 9.5 (2017)
GPU code nameGF100Kaby-Lake-H-GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date31 May 2010 (14 years ago)1 October 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data
Current price$15.99 (0.1x MSRP)$457

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 465 has 889% better value for money than UHD Graphics 630.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35224
CUDA cores352no data
Core clock speed607 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1150 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt15 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate26.7 billion/sec26.45
Floating-point performance855.4 gflops460.8 gflops
Compute performance30xno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)no data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsTwo 6-pinsno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1603 MHz (3206 data rate)System Shared
Memory bandwidth102.6 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.1.103
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 465 6.89
+123%
UHD Graphics 630 3.09

GeForce GTX 465 outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 465 2662
+123%
UHD Graphics 630 1192

GeForce GTX 465 outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 123% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
+111%
19
−111%
1440p21−24
+110%
10
−110%
4K14−16
+100%
7
−100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.89 3.09
Recency 31 May 2010 1 October 2017
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 15 Watt

The GeForce GTX 465 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 630 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 465
Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 91 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3550 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.