Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs GeForce GTX 465

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 465 GTX 470 GTX 470 PhysX Edition GTX 470 X2 GTX 480 GTX 480 Core 512 GTX 490
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 465 with Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, including specs and performance data.

GTX 465
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
6.66

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms GTX 465 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 465 GTX 465
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking567537
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.19no data
Power efficiency2.3818.66
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGF100Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date31 May 2010 (14 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35280
Core clock speed607 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt28 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate26.75no data
Floating-point processing power0.8554 TFLOPSno data
Compute performance30xno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs44no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1603 MHz (3206 data rate)no data
Memory bandwidth102.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMIno data
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.2no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−18.8%
19
+18.8%
1440p9−10
−11.1%
10
+11.1%
4K12−14
−25%
15
+25%

Cost per frame, $

1080p17.44no data
1440p31.00no data
4K23.25no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9
+0%
9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Metro Exodus 27
+0%
27
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 18
+0%
18
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10
+0%
10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5
+0%
Dota 2 22
+0%
22
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24
+0%
24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 17
+0%
17
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6
+0%
6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 14
+0%
14
+0%
World of Tanks 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5
+0%
5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
+0%
4
+0%
Dota 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+0%
20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9
+0%
9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 6
+0%
6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
+0%
6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
World of Tanks 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+0%
10
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how GTX 465 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 19% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 11% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 25% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.66 7.31
Recency 31 May 2010 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 28 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has a 9.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 614.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 465 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 465 is a desktop card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 465
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
HD 6950 Radeon HD 6950
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
vs
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
RX 550 Radeon RX 550
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
GeForce MX330 GeForce MX330
GTX 465 GTX 465
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GTX 465 GTX 465
vs
RTX 4080 RTX 4080
GTX 465 GTX 465
vs
RTX 4090 RTX 4090
GTX 465 GTX 465
vs
RTX 4070 Ti RTX 4070 Ti
9500 GT Mac Edition GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition
vs
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
GTX 275 PhysX Edition GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
vs
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 101 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 941 vote

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.