Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GTX 465

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
460 460 768MB 460 OEM 460 SE 460 SE v2 460 v2 460 v2 ES 460 X2 465
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro 555 Pro 555X Pro 560 Pro 560X Pro 570 Pro 570X Pro 575 Pro 580 Pro 580X Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 4130 Pro WX 4150

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 465 with Radeon Pro WX 3200, including specs and performance data.

GTX 465
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
6.00
+20.5%

GTX 465 outperforms Pro 3200 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 465 GTX 465
Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 3200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking614655
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.023.65
Power efficiency2.436.20
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGF100Polaris 23
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 May 2010 (15 years ago)2 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Pro WX 3200 has 258% better value for money than GTX 465.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores352640
Core clock speed607 MHz1082 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt65 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate26.7534.62
Floating-point processing power0.8554 TFLOPS1.385 TFLOPS
Compute performance30xno data
ROPs3216
TMUs4432
L1 Cache704 KB160 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1603 MHz (3206 data rate)1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.6 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMI4x mini-DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 465 6.00
+20.5%
Pro WX 3200 4.98

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 465 2653
+20.4%
Samples: 554
Pro WX 3200 2203
Samples: 50

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
+10.5%
19
−10.5%
4K9−10
+12.5%
8
−12.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p13.29
−26.8%
10.47
+26.8%
4K31.00
−24.6%
24.88
+24.6%
  • Pro WX 3200 has 27% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Pro WX 3200 has 25% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 49
+0%
49
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 10
+0%
10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+0%
15
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 35
+0%
35
+0%
Far Cry 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+0%
10
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+0%
5
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 9
+0%
9
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how GTX 465 and Pro WX 3200 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 465 is 11% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 465 is 13% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.00 4.98
Recency 31 May 2010 2 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 65 Watt

GTX 465 has a 20.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Pro WX 3200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 207.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 465 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 465 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 465
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
RX 550 Radeon RX 550
Pro WX 3200 Radeon Pro WX 3200
vs
Quadro M600M Quadro M600M
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
GTX 560 GeForce GTX 560
GTX 460 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
vs
8500 GT GeForce 8500 GT
GTX 460 GeForce GTX 460
vs
RTX 4070 Ti RTX 4070 Ti
GTX 465 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
vs
Pro 560 Pro 560
GTX 465 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
vs
Pro 555 Pro 555
GTX 465 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
vs
Pro 570X Pro 570X
GTX 275 PhysX Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
vs
ATI Xbox 360 GPU Xbox 360 GPU
GTX 275 PhysX Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
vs
GeForce4 448 Go GeForce4 448 Go
GT 340 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
vs
H200 SXM 141 GB SXM 141 GB
310 OEM NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
vs
RTX 4090 Mobile RTX 4090 Mobile
GT 240 NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
vs
Tesla K80m Tesla K80m

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 125 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 89 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 465 or Radeon Pro WX 3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.