Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GTX 460 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
460 OEM 460 SE 460 SE v2 460 v2 460 v2 ES 460 X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro 555 Pro 555X Pro 560 Pro 560X Pro 570 Pro 570X Pro 575X Pro 580 Pro 580X Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 4130 Pro WX 4150

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 SE with Radeon Pro WX 3200, including specs and performance data.

GTX 460 SE
2010, $160
1 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
4.73

Pro 3200 outperforms 460 SE by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 460 SE GTX 460 SE
Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 3200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking683660
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.053.58
Power efficiency2.436.24
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGF104Polaris 23
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 November 2010 (15 years ago)2 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Pro WX 3200 has 241% better value for money than GTX 460 SE.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores288640
Core clock speed650 MHz1082 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt65 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature104 °Cno data
Texture fill rate31.2034.62
Floating-point processing power0.7488 TFLOPS1.385 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs4832
L1 Cache384 KB160 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length210 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1700 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth108.8 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Number of display connectors2no data
Display Connectors2 x Dual-Link DVI-I1 x Mini HDMI4x mini-DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.14.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 460 SE 4.73
Pro WX 3200 5.26
+11.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 460 SE 1987
Samples: 710
Pro WX 3200 2209
+11.2%
Samples: 51

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−18.8%
19
+18.8%
4K7−8
−14.3%
8
+14.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p10.00
+4.7%
10.47
−4.7%
4K22.86
+8.8%
24.88
−8.8%
  • GTX 460 SE and Pro WX 3200 have nearly equal cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 460 SE has 9% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 49
+0%
49
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 10
+0%
10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+0%
15
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 35
+0%
35
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+0%
10
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+0%
5
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 9
+0%
9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how GTX 460 SE and Pro WX 3200 compete in popular games:

  • Pro WX 3200 is 19% faster in 1080p
  • Pro WX 3200 is 14% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.73 5.26
Recency 15 November 2010 2 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 65 Watt

Pro WX 3200 has a 11.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 130.8% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 SE in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 SE is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
GeForce GTX 460 SE
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 460 SE GeForce GTX 460 SE
vs
ATI HD 5850 Radeon HD 5850
Pro WX 3200 Radeon Pro WX 3200
vs
W5170M FirePro W5170M
GTX 460 SE GeForce GTX 460 SE
vs
HD 6850 Radeon HD 6850
GTX 460 SE NVIDIA GTX 460 SE
vs
ATI Mobility X1600 X1600
GTX 460 SE NVIDIA GTX 460 SE
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3470 3470
GTX 460 SE NVIDIA GTX 460 SE
vs
ATI HD 5690 5690
GTX 460 SE NVIDIA GTX 460 SE
vs
ATI HD 5970 5970
GTX 460 SE NVIDIA GTX 460 SE
vs
8800 GTS 320 8800 GTS 320
GTX 460 SE NVIDIA GTX 460 SE
vs
Pro 5300 5300
GTX 460 SE NVIDIA GTX 460 SE
vs
RX 6900 XT 6900 XT
GTX 460 SE NVIDIA GTX 460 SE
vs
RX 6750 XT 6750 XT
GTX 460 SE NVIDIA GTX 460 SE
vs
RX 7600 XT 7600 XT
GT 430 OEM NVIDIA GT 430 OEM
vs
Tesla S1075 S1075

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 149 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 89 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 SE or Radeon Pro WX 3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.