Radeon RX 7800 XT vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460M SLI with Radeon RX 7800 XT, including specs and performance data.

GTX 460M SLI
2010
2x1536 MB GDDR5
4.95

RX 7800 XT outperforms GTX 460M SLI by a whopping 1171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking62730
Place by popularitynot in top-10085
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.67
Power efficiencyno data16.56
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameN11E-GSNavi 32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843840
Core clock speed675 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2430 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data263 Watt
Texture fill rateno data583.2
Floating-point processing powerno data37.32 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x1536 MB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data624.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 460M SLI 4.95
RX 7800 XT 62.90
+1171%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 460M SLI 3313
RX 7800 XT 65611
+1880%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 460M SLI 14236
RX 7800 XT 134322
+844%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p52
−1150%
650−700
+1150%
Full HD64
−242%
219
+242%
1440p9−10
−1311%
127
+1311%
4K5−6
−1380%
74
+1380%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.28
1440pno data3.93
4Kno data6.74

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−3125%
258
+3125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−1269%
178
+1269%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−4340%
222
+4340%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−1431%
190−200
+1431%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−936%
110−120
+936%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−2313%
193
+2313%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−927%
110−120
+927%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−979%
150−160
+979%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−642%
230−240
+642%
Hitman 3 10−12
−1027%
120−130
+1027%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−628%
230−240
+628%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−1192%
150−160
+1192%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−808%
110−120
+808%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−1322%
250−260
+1322%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−226%
150−160
+226%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−1908%
261
+1908%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−3520%
181
+3520%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−1431%
190−200
+1431%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−936%
110−120
+936%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1913%
161
+1913%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−927%
110−120
+927%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−979%
150−160
+979%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−642%
230−240
+642%
Hitman 3 10−12
−1027%
120−130
+1027%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−628%
230−240
+628%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−1192%
150−160
+1192%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−808%
110−120
+808%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−2111%
398
+2111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−633%
130−140
+633%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−226%
150−160
+226%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−900%
130
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−3060%
158
+3060%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−936%
110−120
+936%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−1750%
148
+1750%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−927%
110−120
+927%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−616%
222
+616%
Hitman 3 10−12
−1027%
120−130
+1027%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−756%
274
+756%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−1789%
340
+1789%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−1011%
200
+1011%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−215%
145
+215%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−808%
110−120
+808%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1125%
95−100
+1125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−2280%
119
+2280%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1750%
70−75
+1750%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4750%
97
+4750%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1117%
70−75
+1117%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−2364%
270−280
+2364%
Hitman 3 9−10
−900%
90−95
+900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−1873%
217
+1873%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−7300%
148
+7300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−3575%
147
+3575%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−658%
230−240
+658%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−1067%
100−110
+1067%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1725%
70−75
+1725%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1933%
60−65
+1933%
Hitman 3 1−2
−5300%
50−55
+5300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−3086%
220−230
+3086%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−4600%
90−95
+4600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−11700%
118
+11700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2867%
89
+2867%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−3500%
72
+3500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 44
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2050%
40−45
+2050%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4000%
164
+4000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−6600%
67
+6600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1180%
60−65
+1180%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 124
+0%
124
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 243
+0%
243
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130
+0%
130
+0%

This is how GTX 460M SLI and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is 1150% faster in 900p
  • RX 7800 XT is 242% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT is 1311% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT is 1380% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 11700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is ahead in 68 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.95 62.90
Recency 3 September 2010 25 August 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm

RX 7800 XT has a 1170.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460M SLI is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M SLI
GeForce GTX 460M SLI
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce GTX 460M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2635 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.