Moore Threads MTT S80 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
460M 460M SLI 470M 470M SLI 480M 480M SLI 485M 485M SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Moore Threads MTT S10 Moore Threads MTT S50 Moore Threads MTT S70 Moore Threads MTT S80

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460M SLI with Moore Threads MTT S80, including specs and performance data.

GTX 460M SLI
2010
2x1536 MB GDDR5
4.47

Moore Threads MTT S80 outperforms GTX 460M SLI by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 460M SLI GTX 460M SLI
Moore Threads MTT S80

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking682620
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.77
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)MUSA
GPU code nameN11E-GSChunxiao
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844096
Core clock speed675 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistorsno data22,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data255 Watt
Texture fill rateno data460.8
Floating-point processing powerno data14.75 TFLOPS
ROPsno data256
TMUsno data256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x1536 MB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p52
−25%
65−70
+25%
Full HD67
−26.9%
85−90
+26.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Fortnite 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Valorant 55−60
−29.3%
75−80
+29.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
−25%
100−105
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Dota 2 40−45
−25%
50−55
+25%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Fortnite 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Valorant 55−60
−29.3%
75−80
+29.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Dota 2 40−45
−25%
50−55
+25%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Valorant 55−60
−29.3%
75−80
+29.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−28.6%
45−50
+28.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−32.4%
45−50
+32.4%
Valorant 50−55
−27.5%
65−70
+27.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Valorant 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

This is how GTX 460M SLI and Moore Threads MTT S80 compete in popular games:

  • Moore Threads MTT S80 is 25% faster in 900p
  • Moore Threads MTT S80 is 27% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.47 5.93
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm

Moore Threads MTT S80 has a 32.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Moore Threads MTT S80 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Moore Threads MTT S80 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M SLI
GeForce GTX 460M SLI
Moore Threads MTT S80
Moore Threads MTT S80
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 460M SLI GeForce GTX 460M SLI
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
Moore Threads MTT S80
vs
GT 1030 GeForce GT 1030
GTX 460M SLI GeForce GTX 460M SLI
vs
GT 650M SLI GeForce GT 650M SLI
GTX 560M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
vs
Quadro M620 Quadro M620
HD 8470D AMD Radeon HD 8470D
vs
ATI HD 5850 HD 5850
RX 6700 XT AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
vs
R9 M385 R9 M385
RX 9060 XT AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT
vs
R9 M385 R9 M385
RTX 5090 D NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D
vs
R9 M385 R9 M385
Moore Threads MTT S80
vs
GTX 460 768MB GTX 460 768MB
HD Graphics 6000 Intel HD Graphics 6000
vs
HD 6970M HD 6970M
GTX 260 216 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
vs
ATI HD 5770 HD 5770
RX 9070 XT AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
vs
R9 M365X R9 M365X
RX 9070 AMD Radeon RX 9070
vs
R9 M365X R9 M365X

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce GTX 460M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Moore Threads MTT S80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460M SLI or Moore Threads MTT S80, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.