Moore Threads MTT S80 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB

#ad 
Buy GeForce GTX 460 768MB
460 460 768MB 460 OEM 460 SE 460 SE v2 460 v2 460 v2 ES 460 X2
VS
Moore Threads MTT S10 Moore Threads MTT S50 Moore Threads MTT S80

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Moore Threads MTT S80, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 460 768MB
4.20

Moore Threads MTT S80 outperforms GTX 460 768MB by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 460 768MB GTX 460 768MB
Moore Threads MTT S80

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking716614
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.75
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)MUSA
GPU code nameno dataChunxiao
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3364096
Core clock speed675 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistorsno data22,000 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data255 Watt
Texture fill rateno data460.8
Floating-point processing powerno data14.75 TFLOPS
ROPsno data256
TMUsno data256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
−48.9%
70−75
+48.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Fortnite 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Valorant 55−60
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−38.9%
100−105
+38.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Dota 2 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Fortnite 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
−40%
21−24
+40%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Valorant 55−60
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Dota 2 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Valorant 55−60
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Valorant 40−45
−47.7%
65−70
+47.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Valorant 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

This is how GTX 460 768MB and Moore Threads MTT S80 compete in popular games:

  • Moore Threads MTT S80 is 49% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.20 6.32

Moore Threads MTT S80 has a 50.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The Moore Threads MTT S80 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 768MB in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Moore Threads MTT S80
Moore Threads MTT S80
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 460 768MB GeForce GTX 460 768MB
vs
R7 250E Radeon R7 250E
Moore Threads MTT S80
vs
GTX 460 GeForce GTX 460
GTX 460 768MB GeForce GTX 460 768MB
vs
HD 7750 Radeon HD 7750
HD 8470D HD 8470D
vs
ATI HD 5850 HD 5850
RX 6700 XT RX 6700 XT
vs
R9 M385 R9 M385
RX 9060 XT RX 9060 XT
vs
R9 M385 R9 M385
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
vs
R9 M385 R9 M385
Moore Threads MTT S80
vs
GTX 460M SLI GTX 460M SLI
HD Graphics 6000 HD Graphics 6000
vs
HD 6970M HD 6970M
GTX 260 216 GTX 260 Core 216
vs
ATI HD 5770 HD 5770
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT
vs
R9 M365X R9 M365X
RX 9070 RX 9070
vs
R9 M365X R9 M365X
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
vs
R9 M365X R9 M365X

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 103 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 768MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Moore Threads MTT S80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 768MB or Moore Threads MTT S80, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.