Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 460 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 645 OEM GTX 460 SE v2 GTX 460 v2 GTX 460 v2 ES GTX 555 OEM GTX 560 GTX 560 SE GTX 560 Ti GTX 560 Ti OEM GTX 560 Ti X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 v2 with Quadro T2000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

GTX 460 v2
2011, $199
1 GB GDDR5, 160 Watt
4.96

T2000 Max-Q outperforms 460 v2 by a whopping 237% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 460 v2 GTX 460 v2
T2000 Max-Q T2000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking679358
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.92no data
Power efficiency2.3832.08
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF114TU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date24 September 2011 (14 years ago)27 May 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3361024
Core clock speed779 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1620 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate43.62103.7
Floating-point processing power1.046 TFLOPS3.318 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs5664
L1 Cache448 KB1 MB
L2 Cache384 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.19 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.17.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 460 v2 4.96
T2000 Max-Q 16.71
+237%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 460 v2 2074
Samples: 229
T2000 Max-Q 6989
+237%
Samples: 631

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−256%
57
+256%
1440p7−8
−271%
26
+271%
4K10−12
−280%
38
+280%

Cost per frame, $

1080p12.44no data
1440p28.43no data
4K19.90no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 124
+0%
124
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 33
+0%
33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+0%
63
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 113
+0%
113
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+0%
33
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 46
+0%
46
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how GTX 460 v2 and T2000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • T2000 Max-Q is 256% faster in 1080p
  • T2000 Max-Q is 271% faster in 1440p
  • T2000 Max-Q is 280% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.96 16.71
Recency 24 September 2011 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 40 Watt

T2000 Max-Q has a 236.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 v2 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 v2 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro T2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
GeForce GTX 460 v2
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
vs
T600 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile
GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
Radeon 550 Radeon 550
GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
R9 A375 Radeon R9 A375
GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
HD 7560G IGP Radeon HD 7560G IGP
GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
6100 + nForce 405 GeForce 6100 + nForce 405
GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
GeForce4 MX + nForce2 GeForce4 MX + nForce2
GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile
GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
RX 590 GME Radeon RX 590 GME
GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
E9560 PCIe Radeon E9560 PCIe
GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
RX Vega 11 Embedded Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded
GTX 460 v2 GTX 460 v2
vs
RTX 3070 Ti RTX 3070 Ti
GTX 460 v2 GeForce GTX 460 v2
vs
R7 350 640SP Radeon R7 350 640SP

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 21 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 108 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 v2 or Quadro T2000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.