Radeon 740M vs GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated504
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data38.40
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF114Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 September 2011 (13 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336256
Core clock speed779 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2500 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate43.6240.00
Floating-point processing power1.046 TFLOPS2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs5616
Ray Tracing Coresno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1280 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1002 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth128.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMIPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 September 2011 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 740M has an age advantage of 11 years, a 900% more advanced lithography process, and 966.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES and Radeon 740M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES is a desktop card while Radeon 740M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 15 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 69 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.