Tesla C2090 vs GeForce GTX 460 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking616not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.12no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF104GF110
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 November 2010 (13 years ago)25 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores288512
CUDA cores288no data
Core clock speed650 MHz651 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt250 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature104 °Cno data
Texture fill rate31.2041.66
Floating-point performance0.7488 gflops1.332 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length210 mm248 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1700 MHz3696 MHz
Memory bandwidth108.8 GB/s177.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Number of display connectors2no data
Display Connectors2 x Dual-Link DVI-I1 x Mini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.14.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 November 2010 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 460 SE has 66.7% lower power consumption.

Tesla C2090, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Tesla C2090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 SE is a desktop card while Tesla C2090 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
GeForce GTX 460 SE
NVIDIA Tesla C2090
Tesla C2090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 142 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate Tesla C2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.