Radeon RX 5700M vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
460 460 768MB 460 OEM 460 SE 460 SE v2 460 v2 460 v2 ES 460 X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5300M 5500M 5600M 5700M 6550M 6600M 6800M 7600M 7600M XT 7700S 7900M 8060S

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 768MB with Radeon RX 5700M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 460 768MB
4.00
+4.7%

460 768MB outperforms 5700M by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 460 768MB GTX 460 768MB
RX 5700M RX 5700M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking743760
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.63
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 10
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data1 March 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3362304
Core clock speed675 MHz1465 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1720 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,300 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data180 Watt
Texture fill rateno data247.7
Floating-point processing powerno data7.926 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data144
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Fortnite 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Valorant 55−60
+3.8%
50−55
−3.8%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+4.3%
65−70
−4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Fortnite 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+25%
12−14
−25%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+3.8%
50−55
−3.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+3.8%
50−55
−3.8%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+6.9%
27−30
−6.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+3.1%
30−35
−3.1%
Valorant 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GTX 460 768MB and RX 5700M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 460 768MB is 18% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 460 768MB is 25% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 460 768MB performs better in 32 tests (59%)
  • there's a draw in 22 tests (41%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.00 3.82

GTX 460 768MB has a 5% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Radeon RX 5700M.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 768MB is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 5700M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 460 768MB GeForce GTX 460 768MB
vs
R7 250E Radeon R7 250E
RX 5700M Radeon RX 5700M
vs
GTX 285M SLI GeForce GTX 285M SLI
GTX 460 768MB GeForce GTX 460 768MB
vs
HD 7750 Radeon HD 7750
GTX 460 768MB 460 768MB
vs
GTX 650 Ti OEM 650 Ti OEM
GTX 460 768MB GTX 460 768MB
vs
ATI HD 3870 HD 3870
GTX 460 768MB GTX 460 768MB
vs
ATI V4800 V4800
GTX 460 768MB GTX 460 768MB
vs
E9172 MXM E9172 MXM
GTX 460 768MB GTX 460 768MB
vs
Vega 6 Mobile Efficient Vega 6 Mobile Efficient
GTX 460 768MB GTX 460 768MB
vs
T400 Mobile T400 Mobile
GTX 460 768MB GTX 460 768MB
vs
T600 Mobile T600 Mobile
GTX 460 768MB GTX 460 768MB
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
GTX 460 768MB 460 768MB
vs
RTX 4080 Ti Max-Q 4080 Ti Max-Q
GTX 460 768MB 460 768MB
vs
RTX 3060 8 GB GA104 3060 8 GB GA104

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 109 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 768MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 46 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 768MB or Radeon RX 5700M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.