Radeon R7 M340 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GTX 460 768MB
4.39
+158%

GeForce GTX 460 768MB outperforms Radeon R7 M340 by a whopping 158% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking628889
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameno dataMeso Pro DDR3
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data16 June 2015 (8 years ago)
Current price$149 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336320
Compute unitsno data6
Core clock speed675 MHz1021 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1021 MHz
Number of transistorsno data950 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data28 nm
Texture fill rateno data17.16
Floating-point performanceno data549.1 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Radeon R7 M340 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Eyefinityno data1

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAccelerationno data-
Endurono data-
FreeSyncno data1
HD3Dno data+
PowerTuneno data+
DualGraphicsno data1
TrueAudiono data-
ZeroCoreno data+
Switchable graphicsno data1

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11DirectX® 12
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno dataNot Listed
Vulkanno data+
Mantleno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 460 768MB 4.39
+158%
R7 M340 1.70

GeForce GTX 460 768MB outperforms Radeon R7 M340 by 158% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 460 768MB 12262
+126%
R7 M340 5427

GeForce GTX 460 768MB outperforms Radeon R7 M340 by 126% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 460 768MB 2811
+30.8%
R7 M340 2148

GeForce GTX 460 768MB outperforms Radeon R7 M340 by 31% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 460 768MB 2092
+73.1%
R7 M340 1209

GeForce GTX 460 768MB outperforms Radeon R7 M340 by 73% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 460 768MB 17589
+186%
R7 M340 6153

GeForce GTX 460 768MB outperforms Radeon R7 M340 by 186% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GTX 460 768MB 133103
+92.6%
R7 M340 69098

GeForce GTX 460 768MB outperforms Radeon R7 M340 by 93% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
+236%
14
−236%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Hitman 3 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Hitman 3 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+28.6%
7
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+125%
4
−125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Hitman 3 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hitman 3 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1

This is how GTX 460 768MB and R7 M340 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 460 768MB is 236% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 460 768MB is 1100% faster than the R7 M340.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 460 768MB is ahead in 40 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.39 1.70

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M340 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 768MB is a desktop card while Radeon R7 M340 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
AMD Radeon R7 M340
Radeon R7 M340

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 91 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 460 768MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 289 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.