GeForce 9500 GT vs GTX 295

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	753	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.12	no data
Power efficiency	0.79	no data
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	GT200B	G96
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	8 January 2009 (15 years ago)	29 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$500	$85.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	240	32
CUDA cores	480	32
CUDA cores per GPU	240	no data
Core clock speed	576 MHz	550 MHz
Number of transistors	1,400 million	314 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	289 Watt	50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	105 °C
Texture fill rate	46.08	9.600
Floating-point processing power	0.5962 TFLOPS	0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs	28	8
TMUs	80	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	267 mm	175 mm
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None
SLI options	+	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1792 MB	1 GB
Standard memory config per GPU	896 MB	no data
Memory bus width	896 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	999 MHz	800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz
Memory bandwidth	223.8 GB/s	25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2)
Memory interface width per GPU	448 Bit	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Two Dual Link DVIHDMI	Dual Link DVISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor support	+	+
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF	S/PDIF

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)

128bit

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	4.0	4.0
OpenGL	2.1	2.1
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	8 January 2009	29 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount	1792 MB	1 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	289 Watt	50 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---