UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
260M 260M SLI 280M 280M SLI 285M 285M SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
(Jasper Lake 16 EU) (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (Jasper Lake 32 EU) G1 G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) G7 G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) P630 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 285M SLI and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 285M SLI
2009
2 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
3.79
+82.2%

285M SLI outperforms Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 285M SLI GTX 285M SLI
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking753918
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.9516.04
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXGen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 March 2009 (16 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25624
Core clock speed576 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1020 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012_1
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60
+362%
13
−362%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Fortnite 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Valorant 50−55
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+60.5%
40−45
−60.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Dota 2 35−40
+106%
17
−106%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Fortnite 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+50%
8
−50%
Valorant 50−55
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Dota 2 35−40
+119%
16
−119%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+200%
4
−200%
Valorant 50−55
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+93.3%
14−16
−93.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Valorant 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

This is how GTX 285M SLI and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compete in popular games:

  • GTX 285M SLI is 362% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 285M SLI is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 285M SLI performs better in 54 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.79 2.08
Recency 2 March 2009 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 4 Watt

GTX 285M SLI has a 82.2% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 3650% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 285M SLI GeForce GTX 285M SLI
vs
Radeon 540X Radeon 540X
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
GTX 285M SLI GeForce GTX 285M SLI
vs
Radeon 630 Radeon 630
GTX 485M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
vs
RX 6700 XT RX 6700 XT
HD 6790 AMD Radeon HD 6790
vs
GTS 450 GTS 450
HD 6790 AMD Radeon HD 6790
vs
HD 6370M HD 6370M
HD 6790 AMD Radeon HD 6790
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps
HD 6790 AMD Radeon HD 6790
vs
RTX 4060 RTX 4060
GTX 285M SLI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI
vs
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
GTX 285M SLI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI
vs
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
HD 6970M AMD Radeon HD 6970M
vs
GT 520MX GT 520MX
HD 6970M AMD Radeon HD 6970M
vs
UHD Graphics 630 Graphics 630
ATI HD 5770 ATI Radeon HD 5770
vs
ATI V7800P FirePro V7800P

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 60 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 285M SLI or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.