UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
260M 260M SLI 280M 280M SLI 285M 285M SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 285M SLI and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 285M SLI
2009
2 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
3.60

Graphics 750 32EUs outperforms 285M SLI by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 285M SLI GTX 285M SLI
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking751742
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.94no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 March 2009 (16 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25632
Core clock speed576 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1020 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10DirectX 12_1
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60
+275%
16
−275%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 14−16
−20%
18
+20%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−16.7%
14
+16.7%
Fortnite 21−24
−4.5%
21−24
+4.5%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Valorant 50−55
−1.9%
50−55
+1.9%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 14−16
−6.7%
16
+6.7%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+2.9%
34
−2.9%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−8.3%
13
+8.3%
Fortnite 21−24
−4.5%
21−24
+4.5%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−8.3%
13
+8.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+16.7%
6
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 50−55
−1.9%
50−55
+1.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
15
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+12.9%
31
−12.9%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 50−55
−3.8%
55−60
+3.8%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
−4.5%
21−24
+4.5%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 40−45
−5%
40−45
+5%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 18−20
−5.3%
20−22
+5.3%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how GTX 285M SLI and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compete in popular games:

  • GTX 285M SLI is 275% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 285M SLI is 17% faster.
  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 20% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 285M SLI performs better in 3 tests (8%)
  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs performs better in 20 tests (51%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (41%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.60 3.74
Recency 2 March 2009 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs has a 3.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 285M SLI and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 285M SLI GeForce GTX 285M SLI
vs
Radeon 630 Radeon 630
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 645 Iris Plus Graphics 645
GTX 285M SLI GeForce GTX 285M SLI
vs
R9 M370X Radeon R9 M370X
GTX 460 768MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
vs
HD 7610M HD 7610M
GTX 460 768MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3650 Radeon HD 3650
HD 6790 AMD Radeon HD 6790
vs
HD 7850M HD 7850M
HD 6790 AMD Radeon HD 6790
vs
FX 4500 FX 4500
HD 6790 AMD Radeon HD 6790
vs
RTX 4080 RTX 4080
GTX 285M SLI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI
vs
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell PRO 5000 Blackwell
HD 6970M AMD Radeon HD 6970M
vs
FirePro M4000 FirePro M4000
ATI HD 5770 ATI Radeon HD 5770
vs
R5 230 R5 230
ATI HD 5770 ATI Radeon HD 5770
vs
GT 630 OEM GT 630 OEM
ATI HD 5770 ATI Radeon HD 5770
vs
GT 645 OEM GT 645 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 285M SLI or UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.