Radeon RX 570X vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
260M 260M SLI 280M 280M SLI 285M 285M SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
570 570 X2 570G 570X 580 580 2048SP 580 XTR 580G 580X 590 GME

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 285M SLI with Radeon RX 570X, including specs and performance data.

GTX 285M SLI
2009
2 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
3.81

570X outperforms 285M SLI by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 285M SLI GTX 285M SLI
RX 570X RX 570X

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking760696
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.952.95
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXPolaris 20
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 March 2009 (16 years ago)11 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2562048
Core clock speed576 MHz1168 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1244 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data159.2
Floating-point processing powerno data5.095 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data128
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1020 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60
−16.7%
70−75
+16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Fortnite 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Valorant 50−55
−13.2%
60−65
+13.2%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−15.9%
80−85
+15.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Dota 2 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Fortnite 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Valorant 50−55
−13.2%
60−65
+13.2%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Dota 2 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Valorant 50−55
−13.2%
60−65
+13.2%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Valorant 35−40
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Valorant 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GTX 285M SLI and RX 570X compete in popular games:

  • RX 570X is 17% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.81 4.60
Recency 2 March 2009 11 April 2018
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 120 Watt

RX 570X has a 20.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 570X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 285M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 570X is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
AMD Radeon RX 570X
Radeon RX 570X
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 285M SLI GeForce GTX 285M SLI
vs
Radeon 540X Radeon 540X
RX 570X Radeon RX 570X
vs
GTX 460 SE GeForce GTX 460 SE
GTX 285M SLI GeForce GTX 285M SLI
vs
R9 M275X Radeon R9 M275X
GTX 285M SLI NVIDIA GTX 285M SLI
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3430 3430
GTX 285M SLI NVIDIA GTX 285M SLI
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3410 3410
GTX 285M SLI NVIDIA GTX 285M SLI
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3400 3400
GTX 285M SLI NVIDIA GTX 285M SLI
vs
8800 GS Mac Edition 8800 GS Mac Edition
GTX 285M SLI NVIDIA GTX 285M SLI
vs
RX 580X 580X
GTX 285M SLI NVIDIA GTX 285M SLI
vs
Vega 8 Embedded 8 Embedded
GTX 285M SLI NVIDIA GTX 285M SLI
vs
RX 580 2048SP 580 2048SP
GTX 285M SLI NVIDIA GTX 285M SLI
vs
RX 570G 570G
GTX 285M SLI NVIDIA GTX 285M SLI
vs
RTX 6000 Passive 6000 Passive
GTX 285M SLI NVIDIA GTX 285M SLI
vs
CMP 50HX 50HX

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 46 votes

Rate Radeon RX 570X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 285M SLI or Radeon RX 570X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.