Quadro T2000 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 280M GTX 280M SLI GTX 285M GTX 285M SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 285M SLI with Quadro T2000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 285M SLI
2009
2 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
4.12

T2000 Mobile outperforms GTX 285M SLI by a whopping 401% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 285M SLI GTX 285M SLI
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking697276
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.9023.75
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date2 March 2009 (15 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2561024
Core clock speed576 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rateno data114.2
Floating-point processing powerno data3.656 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1020 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60
−400%
300−350
+400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−420%
50−55
+420%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−270%
35−40
+270%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−413%
40−45
+413%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−420%
50−55
+420%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−440%
80−85
+440%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−270%
35−40
+270%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−413%
40−45
+413%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−560%
65−70
+560%
Fortnite 21−24
−364%
100−110
+364%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−339%
75−80
+339%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−575%
50−55
+575%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−363%
70−75
+363%
Valorant 50−55
−174%
140−150
+174%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
−420%
50−55
+420%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−440%
80−85
+440%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−270%
35−40
+270%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−233%
230−240
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−413%
40−45
+413%
Dota 2 35−40
−214%
110−120
+214%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−560%
65−70
+560%
Fortnite 21−24
−364%
100−110
+364%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−339%
75−80
+339%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−575%
50−55
+575%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−508%
70−75
+508%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−363%
70−75
+363%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Valorant 50−55
−174%
140−150
+174%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−440%
80−85
+440%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−270%
35−40
+270%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−413%
40−45
+413%
Dota 2 35−40
−214%
110−120
+214%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−560%
65−70
+560%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−339%
75−80
+339%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−575%
50−55
+575%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−363%
70−75
+363%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Valorant 50−55
−174%
140−150
+174%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−364%
100−110
+364%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−383%
140−150
+383%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−514%
170−180
+514%
Valorant 40−45
−344%
180−190
+344%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 55−60
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−529%
40−45
+529%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−444%
45−50
+444%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−433%
30−35
+433%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Valorant 20−22
−455%
110−120
+455%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Dota 2 12−14
−458%
65−70
+458%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how GTX 285M SLI and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T2000 Mobile is 400% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 1150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T2000 Mobile is ahead in 61 test (92%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.12 20.65
Recency 2 March 2009 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 60 Watt

T2000 Mobile has a 401.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 358.3% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 285M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 285M SLI GeForce GTX 285M SLI
vs
GTX 480M GeForce GTX 480M
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile
vs
P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Mobile
GTX 285M SLI GeForce GTX 285M SLI
vs
R9 M370X Radeon R9 M370X
GTX 470 GTX 470
vs
RTX 5070 RTX 5070
ATI HD 5850 Radeon HD 5850
vs
HD Graphics P3000 HD Graphics P3000
GT 650M SLI GeForce GT 650M SLI
vs
GTS 350M GeForce GTS 350M
GTX 485M GeForce GTX 485M
vs
RX 7990 XTX Radeon RX 7990 XTX
HD 6790 Radeon HD 6790
vs
RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT
ATI HD 5770 Radeon HD 5770
vs
NVS 300M Quadro NVS 300M
R9 M365X Radeon R9 M365X
vs
ATI VGA Wonder VGA Wonder
Quadro M520 Quadro M520
vs
ATI X800 XL Radeon X800 XL
Quadro M520 Quadro M520
vs
GeForce G103M GeForce G103M
Quadro M520 Quadro M520
vs
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 402 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 285M SLI or Quadro T2000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.