ATI Radeon IGP 345M vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7991606
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.64no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXRS200
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 March 2009 (17 years ago)5 October 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed585 MHz183 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million30 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data0.37
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed950 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX107.0
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 10−12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 4−5 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 no data
Far Cry 5 9−10 no data
Fortnite 18−20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 5 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 no data
Valorant 45−50 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 no data
Dota 2 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 9−10 no data
Fortnite 18−20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 5 8−9 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10 no data
Metro Exodus 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 no data
Valorant 45−50 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 no data
Dota 2 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 no data
Valorant 45−50 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 18−20 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 no data
Metro Exodus 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 6−7 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 16−18 no data

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 10−11 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 March 2009 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 55 nm 180 nm

GTX 280M SLI has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 227% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Radeon IGP 345M. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 63 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 280M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 345M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 280M SLI or Radeon IGP 345M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.