Radeon Pro WX 8100 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking799not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.64no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXVega 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 March 2009 (17 years ago)3 December 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2563584
Core clock speed585 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rateno data336.0
Floating-point processing powerno data10.75 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data224
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data6x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.1.125
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 March 2009 3 December 2017
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 230 Watt

GTX 280M SLI has 53% lower power consumption.

Pro WX 8100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Radeon Pro WX 8100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 8100 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 63 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 280M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 280M SLI or Radeon Pro WX 8100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.