GeForce GTS 250 vs GTX 280

Place in performance ranking	699	929
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.24	0.05
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	GT200	G92B
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	16 June 2008 (15 years ago)	4 March 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$649	$199
Current price	$159 (0.2x MSRP)	$131 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 280 has 380% better value for money than GTS 250.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	240	128
CUDA cores	240	128
Core clock speed	602 MHz	738 MHz
Number of transistors	1,400 million	754 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	236 Watt	150 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	105 °C
Texture fill rate	48.2 billion/sec	47.2 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	622.1 gflops	387.1 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)	9" (228.6 mm) (22.9 cm)
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	6-pin & 8-pin	6-pin
SLI options	+	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	512 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1107 MHz	1100 MHz
Memory bandwidth	141.7 GB/s	70.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	HDTVDual Link DVI	Two Dual Link DVI
Multi monitor support	+	+
HDMI	no data	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF	S/PDIF

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	4.0	4.0
OpenGL	2.1	3.0
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 280 3.36
+117%

GTS 250 1.55

GTX 280 outperforms GTS 250 by 117% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 280 1299
+117%

GTS 250 600

GTX 280 outperforms GTS 250 by 117% in Passmark.