GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs GTS 250
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 925 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 0.05 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | G92B | GT200 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 4 March 2009 (15 years ago) | 16 September 2008 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $299 |
| Current price | $131 (0.7x MSRP) | $259 (0.9x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 216 |
| CUDA cores | 128 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 738 MHz | 576 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 754 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 182 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion/sec | 41.47 |
| Floating-point performance | 387.1 gflops | 536.5 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 9" (228.6 mm) (22.9 cm) | 267 mm |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| SLI options | + | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 896 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 448 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1998 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | 111.9 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | no data |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.0 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Recency | 4 March 2009 | 16 September 2008 |
| Cost | $199 | $299 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 896 MB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 182 Watt |
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTS 250 and GeForce GTX 260 Core 216. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
